Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26510416›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2016

Employment and income among first-time cases diagnosed with non-affective psychosis in Stockholm, Sweden: a follow-up study 2004/2005-2010.

Johanna Falk, Bo Burström, Christina Dalman, Lena Jörgensen, Daniel Bruce, Lotta Nylén

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Johanna FalkDepartment of Public Health Sciences (PHS), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. johanna.falk@ki.se.
Bo BurströmDepartment of Public Health Sciences (PHS), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Christina DalmanDepartment of Public Health Sciences (PHS), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lena JörgensenDepartment of Public Health Sciences (PHS), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Daniel BruceDepartment of Public Health Sciences (PHS), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lotta NylénDepartment of Public Health Sciences (PHS), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEStockholm County Council · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNon-affective psychoses (F20-F29) are serious conditions causing a high degree of disability. Loss of income and increasing costs for personal care and treatment are severe consequences following the disorders, but less is known about employment and income in different social strata. The aim was to study these conditions among persons with non-affective psychosis compared to the general population, and possible social differentials.

methodsA population-based follow-up study with 530,350 persons (aged 18-44), including 756 first-time cases diagnosed with non-affective psychosis registered in in- or outpatient psychiatric care in 2005 or 2006. Age-standardised rates of non-employment, disability pension, social assistance and poverty were calculated at baseline and at follow-up in 2010. Odds ratios of poverty were estimated using logistic regression, adjusting for employment status, age, education and country of birth.

resultsBefore diagnosis, rates of non-employment, disability pension and social assistance were higher among persons with non-affective psychosis compared to the general population. At the follow-up, rates of disability pension had doubled, most pronounced among women with only compulsory education. Rates of social assistance were twice as high for foreign-born women. Among persons with non-affective psychosis, non-employment, lower education (among men) and being foreign born (among women) were associated with an increased risk of poverty at follow-up.

conclusionsPoor employment and income conditions were found among persons with non-affective psychosis, but the social insurance system seemed to alleviate the poor income conditions. Early and preventative support to encourage employment and income security is needed, which could support recovery.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultEmploymentFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncomeLogistic ModelsMaleOdds RatioPensionsPersons with DisabilitiesPsychotic DisordersSocial WelfareSwedenYoung AdultCountyEmploymentNon-affective psychosisPovertySocial differentialsStockholm

Identifiers

PMID26510416
OpenAlexW1866888021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.