Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26509809›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Relation of Childhood Home Environment to Cortical Thickness in Late Adolescence: Specificity of Experience and Timing.

Brian B Avants, Daniel A Hackman, Laura M Betancourt, Gwendolyn M Lawson, Hallam Hurt, Martha J Farah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. LearningBrain sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brian B AvantsDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Daniel A HackmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Laura M BetancourtDivision of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Gwendolyn M LawsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Hallam HurtDivision of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Martha J FarahDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

Funding

In Utero Cocaine Use: Adolescent and Young Adult Neurocognitive OutcomeR01DA014129 · NIDA · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI HURT, HALLAM · 2001 to 2011
$6.6M
SES, Childhood Experience, and The Neural Bases of LearningR01HD055689 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FARAH, MARTHA J · 2007 to 2011
$1.5M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD055689NICHD NIH HHS R01-HD055689NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA014129NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA14129
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What are the long-term effects of childhood experience on brain development? Research with animals shows that the quality of environmental stimulation and parental nurturance both play important roles in shaping lifelong brain structure and function. Human research has so far been limited to the effects of abnormal experience and pathological development. Using a unique longitudinal dataset of in-home measures of childhood experience at ages 4 and 8 and MRI acquired in late adolescence, we were able to relate normal variation in childhood experience to later life cortical thickness. Environmental stimulation at age 4 predicted cortical thickness in a set of automatically derived regions in temporal and prefrontal cortex. In contrast, age 8 experience was not predictive. Parental nurturance was not predictive at either age. This work reveals an association between childhood experience and later brain structure that is specific relative to aspects of experience, regions of brain, and timing.

Indexed as

EnvironmentAdolescentCerebral CortexChildFemaleHumansMaleTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26509809
PMCPMC4624931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.