Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26509713›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

RNA 3D Modules in Genome-Wide Predictions of RNA 2D Structure.

Corinna Theis, Craig L Zirbel, Christian Höner Zu Siederdissen, Christian Anthon, Ivo L Hofacker, Henrik Nielsen, Jan Gorodkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Corinna TheisCenter for non-coding RNA in Technology and Health, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark; Department of Veterinary Clinical and Animal Science, Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Craig L ZirbelDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio, United States of America.
Christian Höner Zu SiederdissenInstitute for Theoretical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Bioinformatics Group, Department of Computer Science, and Interdisciplinary Center for Bioinformatics, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; Interdisciplinary Center for Bioinformatics, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Christian AnthonCenter for non-coding RNA in Technology and Health, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Ivo L HofackerCenter for non-coding RNA in Technology and Health, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark; Institute for Theoretical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Group Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Henrik NielsenCenter for non-coding RNA in Technology and Health, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark; Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, The Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jan GorodkinCenter for non-coding RNA in Technology and Health, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark; Department of Veterinary Clinical and Animal Science, Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.

Funding

RNA 3D Motif Search, Atlas, and Prediction from SequenceR01GM085328 · NIGMS · BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ZIRBEL, CRAIG L · 2010 to 2023
$4.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS 2R01GM085328-05NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM085328
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent experimental and computational progress has revealed a large potential for RNA structure in the genome. This has been driven by computational strategies that exploit multiple genomes of related organisms to identify common sequences and secondary structures. However, these computational approaches have two main challenges: they are computationally expensive and they have a relatively high false discovery rate (FDR). Simultaneously, RNA 3D structure analysis has revealed modules composed of non-canonical base pairs which occur in non-homologous positions, apparently by independent evolution. These modules can, for example, occur inside structural elements which in RNA 2D predictions appear as internal loops. Hence one question is if the use of such RNA 3D information can improve the prediction accuracy of RNA secondary structure at a genome-wide level. Here, we use RNAz in combination with 3D module prediction tools and apply them on a 13-way vertebrate sequence-based alignment. We find that RNA 3D modules predicted by metaRNAmodules and JAR3D are significantly enriched in the screened windows compared to their shuffled counterparts. The initially estimated FDR of 47.0% is lowered to below 25% when certain 3D module predictions are present in the window of the 2D prediction. We discuss the implications and prospects for further development of computational strategies for detection of RNA 2D structure in genomic sequence.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsBase PairingNucleic Acid ConformationRNARNA

Identifiers

PMID26509713
PMCPMC4624896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.