Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26509663›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in allergy and clinical immunology2015

Effect of allergen-specific immunotherapy on CD4+ T cells.

Erik Wambre

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. CD8Nature communications · 2022
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. A phenotypically and functionally distinct human TScience translational medicine · 2017
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Redefining the human corneal immune compartment using dynamic intravital imaging.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Guideline on allergen immunotherapy in IgE-mediated allergic diseases: S2K Guideline of the German Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), Society of Pediatric Allergology and Environmental Medicine (GPA), Medical Association of German Allergologists (AeDA), Austrian Society of Allergology and Immunology (ÖGAI), Swiss Society for Allergology and Immunology (SSAI), German Dermatological Society (DDG), German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO-KHC), German Society of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (DGKJ), Society of Pediatric Pulmonology (GPP), German Respiratory Society (DGP), German Professional Association of Otolaryngologists (BVHNO), German Association of Paediatric and Adolescent Care Specialists (BVKJ), Federal Association of Pneumologists, Sleep and Respiratory Physicians (BdP), Professional Association of German Dermatologists (BVDD).Allergologie select · 2022
    Article
  17. AIT: New Avenues in Allergen Immunotherapy.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erik WambreBenaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Virginia Mason Medical Center · US

Funding

Induction and signature of pathogenic T cells in allergyR01AI108839 · NIAID · BENAROYA RESEARCH INST AT VIRGINIA MASON · PI WAMBRE, ERIK · 2014 to 2018
$2.1M
Investigation of T cell responses to immunotherapy using class II tetramersR01AI095074 · NIAID · BENAROYA RESEARCH INST AT VIRGINIA MASON · PI DURHAM, STEPHEN REGINALD, KWOK, WILLIAM W. · 2011 to 2014
$1.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI095074NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI108839
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe aims of this review are to discuss the impact of chronic high-dose allergen exposure on allergen-specific CD4(+) T-cell subset during allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) and discuss recent advances supporting novel mechanisms for desensitization and tolerance induction during AIT. (Figure is included in full-text article.) RECENT

findingsNew technologies for direct molecular and cellular analysis have now provided an unprecedented opportunity to compare the functions and phenotypes of allergen-specific T cells at a single cell level, both in the context of disease and clinical intervention. Recent studies have demonstrated that AIT may restore tolerance by transiently inducing interleukin (IL)-10 producing T cells followed by selective deletion of allergen-specific TH2 cell subset. SUMMARY: With antigen-specific TH2 cells at the core of the allergic process in atopic individuals, the duration and dose of antigen exposure can be the driving force behind current AIT protocol. Mechanisms modulating allergen-specific CD4(+) T-cell responses may include autocrine IL-10 production to limit excessive TH2 cell effector responses, T-cell exhaustion, and preferential proallergic TH2 cell deletion allowing concurrent downregulating T-cell responses to emerge. Administration of AIT in the context of immune modulating strategies able to induce counter-regulatory immune response may lead to improved AIT with durable clinical benefit.

Indexed as

AnimalsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesDesensitization, ImmunologicHumansHypersensitivityImmune ToleranceImmunomodulationInterleukin-10Lymphocyte DepletionTh2 CellsInterleukin-10

Identifiers

PMID26509663
PMCPMC4687447
OpenAlexW2196592560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.