Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26508890›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of women's health2015

Update on denosumab in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis: patient preference and adherence.

Elisa Cairoli, Cristina Eller-Vainicher, Iacopo Chiodini

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of women's health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03293108 (A Phase III, Randomized, Two-armed, Parallel, Double-blind, Active-controlled, Non-inferiority Clinical Trial to Determine the Non-inferior Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety Between Arylia), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03293108 phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

A Phase III, Randomized, Two-armed, Parallel, Double-blind, Active-controlled, Non-inferiority Clinical Trial to Determine the Non-inferior Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety Between Arylia (60 mg, Denosumab, Produced by AryoGen Pharmed) Compared With Prolia® (60 mg, Denosumab, the Reference Drug, Produced by Amgen Company) in the Improvement of Bone Mineral Densitometry (BMD) Among Osteoporotic Postmenopausal Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorAryoGen Pharmed Co.Ran2017 to 2020Enrolled190ConditionsOsteoporosisArmsDenosumab, calcium, vitamin D
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Does theFrontiers in endocrinology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Prompt clinical and biochemical response to denosumab in a young adult patient with craniofacial fibrous dysplasia.Clinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism : the official journal of the Italian Society of Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism, and Skeletal Diseases
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elisa CairoliUnit of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Padiglione Granelli, Milan, Italy ; Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Cristina Eller-VainicherUnit of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Padiglione Granelli, Milan, Italy.
Iacopo ChiodiniUnit of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Padiglione Granelli, Milan, Italy ; Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
University of Milan · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient adherence to many osteoporosis treatments, primarily bisphosphonates, is generally poor, thus leading to a significant reduction in antifracture efficacy. Patient perceptions about the necessity of the prescribed medication to treat osteoporosis and the concerns about the potential adverse effects are important and potentially modifiable determinants of adherence, in addition to other factors, such as difficult dosing regimens and high dosing frequency. Denosumab (Dmab) is a fully human monoclonal antibody against the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL), which, through the prevention of the RANKL/RANK interaction, inhibits osteoclast-mediated bone resorption and significantly reduces the risk of vertebral, nonvertebral, and hip fractures. It is administered subcutaneously every 6 months for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Preference and adherence to Dmab treatment were assessed in various clinical trials. Although with some limitations, available data suggest that Dmab is preferred to bisphosphonates, produces greater satisfaction than bisphosphonates, and would be preferentially chosen for long-term treatment. Moreover, patient perceptions about the necessity of Dmab treatment clearly outweigh the concerns about the injections, and positive beliefs about treatment positively influence medication-taking behavior. According to these data, Dmab may represent a reasonable alternative to bisphosphonates, particularly for osteoporotic women in whom a suboptimal or even poor adherence to oral treatments is expected.

Indexed as

adherencedenosumabosteoporosis treatmentpreferenceRANKLsatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID26508890
PMCPMC4610882
OpenAlexW2150165636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.