ReviewInternational journal of women's health2015
Update on denosumab in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis: patient preference and adherence.
Review in International journal of women's health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03293108 (A Phase III, Randomized, Two-armed, Parallel, Double-blind, Active-controlled, Non-inferiority Clinical Trial to Determine the Non-inferior Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety Between Arylia), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase III, Randomized, Two-armed, Parallel, Double-blind, Active-controlled, Non-inferiority Clinical Trial to Determine the Non-inferior Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety Between Arylia (60 mg, Denosumab, Produced by AryoGen Pharmed) Compared With Prolia® (60 mg, Denosumab, the Reference Drug, Produced by Amgen Company) in the Improvement of Bone Mineral Densitometry (BMD) Among Osteoporotic Postmenopausal Women
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar denosumab candidate (Arylia) compared to the reference product (Prolia®) in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a phase III, randomized, two-armed, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled, and noninferiority clinical trial.Arthritis research & therapy · 2022Trial
- Denosumab Offers Relatively Lower Initial Protection Against Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures in Treatment-Naive Patients Compared With Zoledronate.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Does theFrontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- Denosumab or oral bisphosphonates in primary osteoporosis: a "real-life" study.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2018Article
- Clinical efficacy of PVP and PKP in the treatment of OVCFs after bilateral resection of ovarian cancer.Oncology letters · 2018Article
- Denosumab - a new medication in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review · 2017Article
- Prompt clinical and biochemical response to denosumab in a young adult patient with craniofacial fibrous dysplasia.Clinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism : the official journal of the Italian Society of Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism, and Skeletal DiseasesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient adherence to many osteoporosis treatments, primarily bisphosphonates, is generally poor, thus leading to a significant reduction in antifracture efficacy. Patient perceptions about the necessity of the prescribed medication to treat osteoporosis and the concerns about the potential adverse effects are important and potentially modifiable determinants of adherence, in addition to other factors, such as difficult dosing regimens and high dosing frequency. Denosumab (Dmab) is a fully human monoclonal antibody against the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL), which, through the prevention of the RANKL/RANK interaction, inhibits osteoclast-mediated bone resorption and significantly reduces the risk of vertebral, nonvertebral, and hip fractures. It is administered subcutaneously every 6 months for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Preference and adherence to Dmab treatment were assessed in various clinical trials. Although with some limitations, available data suggest that Dmab is preferred to bisphosphonates, produces greater satisfaction than bisphosphonates, and would be preferentially chosen for long-term treatment. Moreover, patient perceptions about the necessity of Dmab treatment clearly outweigh the concerns about the injections, and positive beliefs about treatment positively influence medication-taking behavior. According to these data, Dmab may represent a reasonable alternative to bisphosphonates, particularly for osteoporotic women in whom a suboptimal or even poor adherence to oral treatments is expected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.