Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26508849›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2015

A new approach to assess COPD by identifying lung function break-points.

Göran Eriksson, Linnea Jarenbäck, Stefan Peterson, Jaro Ankerst, Leif Bjermer, Ellen Tufvesson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Bronchodilator response of advanced lung function parameters depending on COPD severity.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Göran ErikssonRespiratory Medicine and Allergology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Linnea JarenbäckRespiratory Medicine and Allergology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Stefan PetersonRegional Cancer Center South, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Jaro AnkerstRespiratory Medicine and Allergology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Leif BjermerRespiratory Medicine and Allergology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Ellen TufvessonRespiratory Medicine and Allergology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCOPD is a progressive disease, which can take different routes, leading to great heterogeneity. The aim of the post-hoc analysis reported here was to perform continuous analyses of advanced lung function measurements, using linear and nonlinear regressions. PATIENTS AND

methodsFifty-one COPD patients with mild to very severe disease (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease [GOLD] Stages I-IV) and 41 healthy smokers were investigated post-bronchodilation by flow-volume spirometry, body plethysmography, diffusion capacity testing, and impulse oscillometry. The relationship between COPD severity, based on forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and different lung function parameters was analyzed by flexible nonparametric method, linear regression, and segmented linear regression with break-points.

resultsMost lung function parameters were nonlinear in relation to spirometric severity. Parameters related to volume (residual volume, functional residual capacity, total lung capacity, diffusion capacity [diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide], diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide/alveolar volume) and reactance (reactance area and reactance at 5Hz) were segmented with break-points at 60%-70% of FEV1. FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) and resonance frequency had break-points around 80% of FEV1, while many resistance parameters had break-points below 40%. The slopes in percent predicted differed; resistance at 5 Hz minus resistance at 20 Hz had a linear slope change of -5.3 per unit FEV1, while residual volume had no slope change above and -3.3 change per unit FEV1 below its break-point of 61%.

conclusionContinuous analyses of different lung function parameters over the spirometric COPD severity range gave valuable information additional to categorical analyses. Parameters related to volume, diffusion capacity, and reactance showed break-points around 65% of FEV1, indicating that air trapping starts to dominate in moderate COPD (FEV1 =50%-80%). This may have an impact on the patient's management plan and selection of patients and/or outcomes in clinical research.

Indexed as

Monitoring, PhysiologicPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAgedBronchial Provocation TestsDisease ManagementDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansLung Volume MeasurementsMaleMiddle AgedOscillometryPlethysmography, Whole BodySeverity of Illness IndexSmokingStatistics as Topicbody plethysmographybreak-pointimpulse oscillometryseveritysingle-breath carbon-monoxide diffusion testspirometry

Identifiers

PMID26508849
PMCPMC4610777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.