Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26508775›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2015

TaFROG Encodes a Pooideae Orphan Protein That Interacts with SnRK1 and Enhances Resistance to the Mycotoxigenic Fungus Fusarium graminearum.

Alexandre Perochon, Jia Jianguang, Amal Kahla, Chanemougasoundharam Arunachalam, Steven R Scofield, Sarah Bowden, Emma Wallington, Fiona M Doohan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Construction and evaluation ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Characterization of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  20. Action Mechanisms of Effectors in Plant-Pathogen Interaction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Alexandre PerochonUniversity College Dublin Earth Institute and School of Biology and Environmental Science, College of Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland (A.P., J.J., A.K., C.A., F.M.D.);United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Crop Production and Pest Control Research Unit, and Purdue University, Department of Agronomy, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-2054 (S.R.S.); andNational Institute of Agricultural Botany, Cambridge, CB3 0LE, United Kingdom (S.B., E.W.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4589-2105
Jia JianguangUniversity College Dublin Earth Institute and School of Biology and Environmental Science, College of Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland (A.P., J.J., A.K., C.A., F.M.D.);United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Crop Production and Pest Control Research Unit, and Purdue University, Department of Agronomy, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-2054 (S.R.S.); andNational Institute of Agricultural Botany, Cambridge, CB3 0LE, United Kingdom (S.B., E.W.).
Amal KahlaUniversity College Dublin Earth Institute and School of Biology and Environmental Science, College of Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland (A.P., J.J., A.K., C.A., F.M.D.);United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Crop Production and Pest Control Research Unit, and Purdue University, Department of Agronomy, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-2054 (S.R.S.); andNational Institute of Agricultural Botany, Cambridge, CB3 0LE, United Kingdom (S.B., E.W.).
Chanemougasoundharam ArunachalamUniversity College Dublin Earth Institute and School of Biology and Environmental Science, College of Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland (A.P., J.J., A.K., C.A., F.M.D.);United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Crop Production and Pest Control Research Unit, and Purdue University, Department of Agronomy, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-2054 (S.R.S.); andNational Institute of Agricultural Botany, Cambridge, CB3 0LE, United Kingdom (S.B., E.W.).
Steven R ScofieldUniversity College Dublin Earth Institute and School of Biology and Environmental Science, College of Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland (A.P., J.J., A.K., C.A., F.M.D.);United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Crop Production and Pest Control Research Unit, and Purdue University, Department of Agronomy, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-2054 (S.R.S.); andNational Institute of Agricultural Botany, Cambridge, CB3 0LE, United Kingdom (S.B., E.W.).
Sarah BowdenUniversity College Dublin Earth Institute and School of Biology and Environmental Science, College of Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland (A.P., J.J., A.K., C.A., F.M.D.);United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Crop Production and Pest Control Research Unit, and Purdue University, Department of Agronomy, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-2054 (S.R.S.); andNational Institute of Agricultural Botany, Cambridge, CB3 0LE, United Kingdom (S.B., E.W.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5105-076X
Emma WallingtonUniversity College Dublin Earth Institute and School of Biology and Environmental Science, College of Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland (A.P., J.J., A.K., C.A., F.M.D.);United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Crop Production and Pest Control Research Unit, and Purdue University, Department of Agronomy, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-2054 (S.R.S.); andNational Institute of Agricultural Botany, Cambridge, CB3 0LE, United Kingdom (S.B., E.W.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3715-7901
Fiona M DoohanUniversity College Dublin Earth Institute and School of Biology and Environmental Science, College of Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland (A.P., J.J., A.K., C.A., F.M.D.);United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Crop Production and Pest Control Research Unit, and Purdue University, Department of Agronomy, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-2054 (S.R.S.); andNational Institute of Agricultural Botany, Cambridge, CB3 0LE, United Kingdom (S.B., E.W.) fiona.doohan@ucd.ie.
University College Dublin · IENational Institute of Agricultural Botany · GBPurdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All genomes encode taxonomically restricted orphan genes, and the vast majority are of unknown function. There is growing evidence that such genes play an important role in the environmental adaptation of taxa. We report the functional characterization of an orphan gene (Triticum aestivum Fusarium Resistance Orphan Gene [TaFROG]) as a component of resistance to the globally important wheat (T. aestivum) disease, Fusarium head blight. TaFROG is taxonomically restricted to the grass subfamily Pooideae. Gene expression studies showed that it is a component of the early wheat response to the mycotoxin deoxynivalenol (DON), which is a virulence factor produced by the causal fungal agent of Fusarium head blight, Fusarium graminearum. The temporal induction of TaFROG by F. graminearum in wheat spikelets correlated with the activation of the defense Triticum aestivum Pathogenesis-Related-1 (TaPR1) gene. But unlike TaPR1, TaFROG induction by F. graminearum was toxin dependent, as determined via comparative analysis of the effects of wild-type fungus and a DON minus mutant derivative. Using virus-induced gene silencing and overexpressing transgenic wheat lines, we present evidence that TaFROG contributes to host resistance to both DON and F. graminearum. TaFROG is an intrinsically disordered protein, and it localized to the nucleus. A wheat alpha subunit of the Sucrose Non-Fermenting1-Related Kinase1 was identified as a TaFROG-interacting protein based on a yeast two-hybrid study. In planta bimolecular fluorescence complementation assays confirmed the interaction. Thus, we conclude that TaFROG encodes a new Sucrose Non-Fermenting1-Related Kinase1-interacting protein and enhances biotic stress resistance.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceDisease ResistanceFusariumGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantHost-Pathogen InteractionsImmunoblottingMicroscopy, ConfocalMolecular Sequence DataMutationMycotoxinsPlant DiseasesPlant ProteinsPlants, Genetically ModifiedProtein BindingProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesdeoxynivalenolMycotoxinspathogenesis-related proteins, plantPlant ProteinsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSNF1-related protein kinasesTrichothecenes

Identifiers

PMID26508775
PMCPMC4677899
OpenAlexW2096536772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.