Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26508758›Full record

ReviewBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2016

Understanding the fabric of protein crystals: computational classification of biological interfaces and crystal contacts.

Guido Capitani, Jose M Duarte, Kumaran Baskaran, Spencer Bliven, Joseph C Somody

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Antibody interfaces revealed through structural mining.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Quaternary Structure of the Tryptophan Synthase α-Subunit Homolog BX1 fromJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Guido CapitaniLaboratory of Biomolecular Research, Paul Scherrer Institute, OFLC/110, 5232 Villigen PSI, Department of Biology, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland.
Jose M DuarteLaboratory of Biomolecular Research, Paul Scherrer Institute, OFLC/110, 5232 Villigen PSI, Department of Biology, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland.
Kumaran BaskaranLaboratory of Biomolecular Research, Paul Scherrer Institute, OFLC/110, 5232 Villigen PSI.
Spencer BlivenLaboratory of Biomolecular Research, Paul Scherrer Institute, OFLC/110, 5232 Villigen PSI, Bioinformatics and Systems Biology Program, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, National Center for Biotechnology Information, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA and.
Joseph C SomodyLaboratory of Biomolecular Research, Paul Scherrer Institute, OFLC/110, 5232 Villigen PSI, Department of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern structural biology still draws the vast majority of information from crystallography, a technique where the objects being investigated are embedded in a crystal lattice. Given the complexity and variety of those objects, it becomes fundamental to computationally assess which of the interfaces in the lattice are biologically relevant and which are simply crystal contacts. Since the mid-1990s, several approaches have been applied to obtain high-accuracy classification of crystal contacts and biological protein-protein interfaces. This review provides an overview of the concepts and main approaches to protein interface classification: thermodynamic estimation of interface stability, evolutionary approaches based on conservation of interface residues, and co-occurrence of the interface across different crystal forms. Among the three categories, evolutionary approaches offer the strongest promise for improvement, thanks to the incessant growth in sequence knowledge. Importantly, protein interface classification algorithms can also be used on multimeric structures obtained using other high-resolution techniques or for protein assembly design or validation purposes. A key issue linked to protein interface classification is the identification of the biological assembly of a crystal structure and the analysis of its symmetry. Here, we highlight the most important concepts and problems to be overcome in assembly prediction. Over the next few years, tools and concepts of interface classification will probably become more frequently used and integrated in several areas of structural biology and structural bioinformatics. Among the main challenges for the future are better addressing of weak interfaces and the application of interface classification concepts to prediction problems like protein-protein docking.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputational BiologyCrystallography, X-RayHumansModels, MolecularProtein BindingProtein ConformationProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID26508758
PMCPMC4743631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.