Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26508515›Full record

Observational studyClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2016

Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment Outcomes in Relation to Treatment and Initial Versus Acquired Second-Line Drug Resistance.

J Peter Cegielski, Ekaterina Kurbatova, Martie van der Walt, Jeannette Brand, Julia Ershova, Thelma Tupasi, Janice Campos Caoili, Tracy Dalton, Carmen Contreras, Martin Yagui and 67 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Treatment of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. An Official ATS/CDC/ERS/IDSA Clinical Practice Guideline.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2019
    Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

77 authors at 15 institutions in 10 countries.

J Peter CegielskiUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Ekaterina KurbatovaUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Martie van der WaltMedical Research Council, Pretoria, Republic of South Africa.
Jeannette BrandMedical Research Council, Pretoria, Republic of South Africa.
Julia ErshovaUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Thelma TupasiTropical Disease Foundation, Manila, Philippines.
Janice Campos CaoiliTropical Disease Foundation, Manila, Philippines.
Tracy DaltonUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Carmen ContrerasSocios en Salud Sucursal.
Martin YaguiNational Institute of Health, Lima, Peru.
Jaime BayonaSocios en Salud Sucursal.
Charlotte KvasnovskyUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Vaira LeimaneRiga East University Hospital Centre of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Latvia.
Liga KuksaRiga East University Hospital Centre of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Latvia.
Michael P ChenUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Laura E ViaNational Institute for Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Soo Hee HwangNational Masan Hospital, Changwon.
Melanie WolfgangUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Grigory V VolchenkovVladimir Oblast Tuberculosis Dispensary.
Tatiana SomovaVladimir Oblast Tuberculosis Dispensary.
Sarah E SmithUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Somsak AkksilpMinistry of Health, Bangkok.
Wanpen WattanaamornkietOffice of Disease Prevention and Control Region 7, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand.
Hee Jin KimKorean Institute of Tuberculosis, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chang-Ki KimKorean Institute of Tuberculosis, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Boris Y KazennyyOrel Oblast Tuberculosis Dispensary.
Tatiana KhoroshevaOrel Oblast Tuberculosis Dispensary.
Kai KliimanTartu University Hospital.
Piret ViikleppNational Tuberculosis Registry, National Institute for Health Development,Tallinn, Estonia.
Ruwen JouTaiwan Centers for Disease Control, Taipei.
Angela Song-En HuangTaiwan Centers for Disease Control, Taipei.
Irina A VasilyevaCentral Tuberculosis Research Institute, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Olga V DemikhovaCentral Tuberculosis Research Institute, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Global PETTS Investigators
Joey Lancaster
Ronel Odendaal
Lois Diem
Therese C Perez
Tarcela Gler
Kathrine Tan
Cesar Bonilla
Oswaldo Jave
Luis Asencios
Gloria Yale
Carmen Suarez
Allison Taylor Walker
Inga Norvaisha
Girts Skenders
Ingrida Sture
Vija Riekstina
Andra Cirule
Erika Sigman
Sang-Nae Cho
Ying Cai
Seokyong Eum
Jongseok Lee
Seungkyu Park
Doosoo Jeon
Isdore C Shamputa
Beverly Metchock
Tatiana Kuznetsova
Rattanawadee Akksilp
Wanlaya Sitti
Jirapan Inyapong
Elena V Kiryanova
Irina Degtyareva
Evgenia S Nemtsova
Klavdia Levina
Manfred Danilovits
Tiina Kummik
Yung-Chao Lei
Wei-Lun Huang
Vladislav V Erokhin
Larisa N Chernousova
Sofia N Andreevskaya
Elena E Larionova
Tatyana G Smirnova
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USCentral Scientific Research Institute of Tuberculosis Russian Academy of Medical Sciences · RUEsSALUD · PEKorea National Tuberculosis Association · KROrel State Agrarian University · RUResearch Institute for Tropical Medicine · PHRiga East University Hospital · LVSouth African Medical Research Council · ZAMasan National Tuberculosis Hospital · KRMinistry of Public Health · THNational Institute for Health Development · EENational Institute of Quality · PENational Institutes of Health · USOffice of Disease Prevention · USTartu University Hospital · EE

Funding

International Research in Korea: Clinical Studies of Drug-Resistant TuberculosisZIAAI001067 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI BARRY, CLIFTON · 2009 to 2017
$6.9M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResistance to second-line drugs develops during treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis, but the impact on treatment outcome has not been determined.

methodsPatients with MDR tuberculosis starting second-line drug treatment were enrolled in a prospective cohort study. Sputum cultures were analyzed at a central reference laboratory. We compared subjects with successful and poor treatment outcomes in terms of (1) initial and acquired resistance to fluoroquinolones and second-line injectable drugs (SLIs) and (2) treatment regimens.

resultsOf 1244 patients with MDR tuberculosis, 973 (78.2%) had known outcomes and 232 (18.6%) were lost to follow-up. Among those with known outcomes, treatment succeeded in 85.8% with plain MDR tuberculosis, 69.7% with initial resistance to either a fluoroquinolone or an SLI, 37.5% with acquired resistance to a fluoroquinolone or SLI, 29.3% with initial and 13.0% with acquired extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (P < .001 for trend). In contrast, among those with known outcomes, treatment success increased stepwise from 41.6% to 92.3% as the number of drugs proven effective increased from ≤1 to ≥5 (P < .001 for trend), while acquired drug resistance decreased from 12% to 16% range, depending on the drug, down to 0%-2% (P < .001 for trend). In multivariable analysis, the adjusted odds of treatment success decreased 0.62-fold (95% confidence interval, .56-.69) for each increment in drug resistance and increased 2.1-fold (1.40-3.18) for each additional effective drug, controlling for differences between programs and patients. Specific treatment, patient, and program variables were also associated with treatment outcome.

conclusionsIncreasing drug resistance was associated in a logical stepwise manner with poor treatment outcomes. Acquired resistance was worse than initial resistance to the same drugs. Increasing numbers of effective drugs, specific drugs, and specific program characteristics were associated with better outcomes and less acquired resistance.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntitubercular AgentsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMycobacterium tuberculosisProspective StudiesSputumTreatment OutcomeTuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantYoung AdultAntitubercular Agentsacquired drug resistanceextensively drug-resistant tuberculosismultidrug-resistant tuberculosissecond-line drugstreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID26508515
PMCPMC4725381
OpenAlexW2187707028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.