Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26508446›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2015

Prediction of response to anti-EGFR antibody-based therapies by multigene sequencing in colorectal cancer patients.

Laura Lupini, Cristian Bassi, Jitka Mlcochova, Gentian Musa, Marta Russo, Petra Vychytilova-Faltejskova, Marek Svoboda, Silvia Sabbioni, Radim Nemecek, Ondrej Slaby and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a target of the tumor-suppressor E3 ligase FBXW7.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Mutational Status ofCancers · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura LupiniDepartment of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara, Via Luigi Borsari 46, 44121, Ferrara, Italy. lpnlra@unife.it.
Cristian BassiDepartment of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara, Via Luigi Borsari 46, 44121, Ferrara, Italy. cristian.bassi@gmail.com.
Jitka MlcochovaCentral European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Molecular Oncology II, University Campus Bohunice Building A3, Kamenice 5, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic. mlcochovajitka@gmail.com.
Gentian MusaDepartment of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara, Via Luigi Borsari 46, 44121, Ferrara, Italy. unclege84@gmail.com.
Marta RussoDepartment of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara, Via Luigi Borsari 46, 44121, Ferrara, Italy. marta.russo@student.unife.it.
Petra Vychytilova-FaltejskovaCentral European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Molecular Oncology II, University Campus Bohunice Building A3, Kamenice 5, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic. vychytilova.petra@seznam.cz.
Marek SvobodaCentral European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Molecular Oncology II, University Campus Bohunice Building A3, Kamenice 5, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic. msvoboda@mou.cz.
Silvia SabbioniDepartment of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, University of Ferrara, Via Luigi Borsari 46, 44121, Ferrara, Italy. sbs@unife.it.
Radim NemecekDepartment of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic. nemecek@mou.cz.
Ondrej SlabyCentral European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Molecular Oncology II, University Campus Bohunice Building A3, Kamenice 5, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic. on.slaby@gmail.com.
Massimo NegriniDepartment of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara, Via Luigi Borsari 46, 44121, Ferrara, Italy. ngm@unife.it.
University of Ferrara · ITCentral European Institute of Technology · CZMasaryk Memorial Cancer Institute · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (moAbs) cetuximab or panitumumab are administered to colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who harbor wild-type RAS proto-oncogenes. However, a percentage of patients do not respond to this treatment. In addition to mutations in the RAS genes, mutations in other genes, such as BRAF, PI3KCA, or PTEN, could be involved in the resistance to anti-EGFR moAb therapy.

methodsIn order to develop a comprehensive approach for the detection of mutations and to eventually identify other genes responsible for resistance to anti-EGFR moAbs, we investigated a panel of 21 genes by parallel sequencing on the Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine platform. We sequenced 65 CRCs that were treated with cetuximab or panitumumab. Among these, 37 samples were responsive and 28 were resistant.

resultsWe confirmed that mutations in EGFR-pathway genes (KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PI3KCA) were relevant for conferring resistance to therapy and could predict response (p = 0.001). After exclusion of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PI3KCA combined mutations could still significantly associate to resistant phenotype (p = 0.045, by Fisher exact test). In addition, mutations in FBXW7 and SMAD4 were prevalent in cases that were non-responsive to anti-EGFR moAb. After we combined the mutations of all genes (excluding KRAS), the ability to predict response to therapy improved significantly (p = 0.002, by Fisher exact test).

conclusionsThe combination of mutations at KRAS and at the five gene panel demonstrates the usefulness and feasibility of multigene sequencing to assess response to anti-EGFR moAbs. The application of parallel sequencing technology in clinical practice, in addition to its innate ability to simultaneously examine the genetic status of several cancer genes, proved to be more accurate and sensitive than the presently in use traditional approaches.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCetuximabColorectal NeoplasmsErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPanitumumabPredictive Value of TestsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCetuximabEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsPanitumumab

Identifiers

PMID26508446
PMCPMC4624582
OpenAlexW1865727470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.