SynthesisScientific reports2015
Analyzing large-scale samples confirms the association between the rs1051730 polymorphism and lung cancer susceptibility.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Analyzing 74,248 Samples Confirms the Association Between CLU rs11136000 Polymorphism and Alzheimer's Disease in Caucasian But Not Chinese population.Scientific reports · 2018Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of association between TCF7L2 polymorphism rs7903146 and type 2 diabetes mellitus.BMC medical genetics · 2018Pooled it
- Article
- Identification of Withaferin A as a Potential Candidate for Anti-Cancer Therapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2019Article
- Identifying genetic markers associated with susceptibility to cardiovascular diseases.Future science OA · 2019Review
- Integrating the Ribonucleic Acid Sequencing Data From Various Studies for Exploring the Multiple Sclerosis-Related Long Noncoding Ribonucleic Acids and Their Functions.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Exonuclease III-Regulated Target Cyclic Amplification-Based Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Detection Using Ultrathin Ternary Chalcogenide Nanosheets.Frontiers in chemistry · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The early genome-wide association studies (GWAS) found a significant association between lung cancer and rs1051730 (15q25) polymorphism. However, the subsequent studies reported consistent and inconsistent results in different populations. Three meta-analysis studies were thus performed to reevaluate the association. But their results remain inconsistent. After that, some new GWAS studies reported conflicting results again. We think that the divergence of these results may be due to small-scale samples or heterogeneity among different populations. Therefore, we reevaluated the association by collecting more samples (N = 33,617 cases and 116,639 controls) from 31 studies, which incorporate 8 new studies and 23 previous studies used by one or more of the three meta-analysis studies. We observed a significant association between lung cancer and rs1051730 in pooled population by using allele (OR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.27-1.34, P < 0.0001), dominant (OR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.29-1.55, P < 0.0001), recessive (OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.42-1.65, P < 0.0001) and additive (OR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.61-1.90, P < 0.0001) models. Through the subgroup analysis, we observed a significant heterogeneity only in East Asian population (P = 0.006, I(2) = 66.9%), and the association is significant in all subgroups (OR = 1.2976, 95% CI = 1.2622-1.3339 (European ancestry), OR = 1.5025, 95% CI = 1.2465-1.8110 (African), OR = 1.7818, 95% CI = 1.3915-2.2815 (East Asian), P < 0.0001). We believe that these results will contribute to understanding the genetic mechanism of lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.