Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26508087›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2015

Specialist teams for neonatal transport to neonatal intensive care units for prevention of morbidity and mortality.

Alvin S M Chang, Andrew Berry, Lisa J Jones, Subramaniam Sivasangari

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Case for Neonatal Specialist Transport Teams.Journal of pediatrics. Clinical practice · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. [Neonatal transport for disasters].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alvin S M ChangDepartment of Neonatology, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore, Singapore, 229899.
Andrew Berry
Lisa J Jones
Subramaniam Sivasangari

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal antenatal transfers provide better neonatal outcomes. However, there will inevitably be some infants who require acute transport to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Because of this, many institutions develop services to provide neonatal transport by specially trained health personnel. However, few studies report on relevant clinical outcomes in infants requiring transport to NICU.

objectivesTo determine the effects of specialist transport teams compared with non-specialist transport teams on the risk of neonatal mortality and morbidity among high-risk newborn infants requiring transport to neonatal intensive care. SEARCH

methodsWe used the standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2015, Issue 7), MEDLINE (1966 to 31 July 2015), EMBASE (1980 to 31 July 2015), CINAHL (1982 to 31 July 2015), conference proceedings, and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: STUDY

designrandomised, quasi-randomised or cluster randomised controlled trials. POPULATION: neonates requiring transport to a neonatal intensive care unit.

interventiontransport by a specialist team compared to a non-specialist team. OUTCOMES: any of the following outcomes - death; adverse events during transport leading to respiratory compromise; and condition on admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The methodological quality of the trials was assessed using the information provided in the studies and by personal communication with the author. Data on relevant outcomes were extracted and the effect size estimated and reported as risk ratio (RR), risk difference (RD), number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) or number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes. Data from cluster randomised trials were not combined for analysis. MAIN

resultsOne trial met the inclusion criteria of this review but was considered ineligible owing to serious bias in the reporting of the results. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThere is no reliable evidence from randomised trials to support or refute the effects of specialist neonatal transport teams for neonatal retrieval on infant morbidity and mortality. Cluster randomised trial study designs may be best suited to provide us with answers on effectiveness and clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Intensive Care Units, NeonatalSpecializationHumansInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornPatient Care TeamTransportation of Patients

Identifiers

PMID26508087
PMCPMC9239562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.