ReviewCNS drugs2015
Practical Use of Newer Antiepileptic Drugs as Adjunctive Therapy in Focal Epilepsy.
Review in CNS drugs, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03796520 (Clinical Validation Study of the Simplified Seizure Classification Algorithm), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical Validation Study of the Simplified Seizure Classification Algorithm
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neurodegenerative pathways as targets for acquired epilepsy therapy development.Epilepsia open · 2020Review
- Budget Impact Analysis of Brivaracetam Adjunctive Therapy for Partial-Onset Epileptic Seizures in Valencia Community, Spain.Clinical drug investigation · 2018Article
- Sodium Channel Blockers in the Treatment of Epilepsy.CNS drugs · 2017Review
- Tolerability and Safety of Commonly Used Antiepileptic Drugs in Adolescents and Adults: A Clinician's Overview.CNS drugs · 2017Review
- Pharmacological Treatment of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy in Adults: a Practical Guide.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2016Review
- [Impact of early benefit assessment on patients with epilepsy in Germany: Current healthcare provision and therapeutic needs].Der Nervenarzt · 2016Article
- Efficacy of Lacosamide Add-on Therapy on Refractory Focal Epilepsies in Children and Adolescents: An Open-Label Clinical Trial.Journal of research in pharmacy practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article lays the background for, and discusses the practical issues surrounding, the adjunctive use of the last four antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) to be licensed for the treatment of pharmacoresistant focal seizures in the UK and elsewhere. More than 30% of adolescent and adult patients will not be fully controlled on the currently available therapeutic armamentarium. After not responding to their first three AED schedules, only a handful of patients attained seizure freedom on subsequent regimens. To optimise the response to any new AED in this setting, it is often necessary to reduce the existing drug burden. The pharmacology, tolerability and safety, and everyday use of lacosamide, eslicarbazepine acetate, retigabine (ezogabine) and perampanel will be reviewed and discussed. This will be accompanied by data from prospective audits with each drug undertaken at the Western Infirmary in Glasgow, Scotland, and a report of their successful introduction in an illustrative case. Overall, there is a large variation in the course of refractory epilepsy and the effect of AED therapy on this process seems minimal. Nevertheless, a number of patients will benefit from the introduction of each new AED, with some becoming seizure-free.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.