Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26507797›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2015

Molecular Evolution of Drosophila Germline Stem Cell and Neural Stem Cell Regulating Genes.

Jae Young Choi, Charles F Aquadro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jae Young ChoiDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University jc2439@cornell.edu.
Charles F AquadroDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University.

Funding

Adaptive Protein Evolution of the Drosophila Germline Stem Cell Gene Bag of MarblesR01GM095793 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI AQUADRO, CHARLES F · 2011 to 2024
$3.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM095793NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM095793
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here, we study the molecular evolution of a near complete set of genes that had functional evidence in the regulation of the Drosophila germline and neural stem cell. Some of these genes have previously been shown to be rapidly evolving by positive selection raising the possibility that stem cell genes as a group have elevated signatures of positive selection. Using recent Drosophila comparative genome sequences and population genomic sequences of Drosophila melanogaster, we have investigated both long- and short-term evolution occurring across these two different stem cell systems, and compared them with a carefully chosen random set of genes to represent the background rate of evolution. Our results showed an excess of genes with evidence of a recent selective sweep in both germline and neural stem cells in D. melanogaster. However compared with their control genes, both stem cell systems had no significant excess of genes with long-term recurrent positive selection in D. melanogaster, or across orthologous sequences from the melanogaster group. The evidence of long-term positive selection was limited to a subset of genes with specific functions in both the germline and neural stem cell system.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularSelection, GeneticAnimalsComparative Genomic HybridizationDrosophila melanogasterGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenetics, PopulationGenome, InsectGerm CellsModels, GeneticNeural Stem CellsPolymorphism, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNAadaptive evolutionDrosophilagermline stem cellneural stem cellpopulation genomicspositive selection

Identifiers

PMID26507797
PMCPMC4994752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.