Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26507656›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2015

The T210M Substitution in the HLA-a*02:01 gp100 Epitope Strongly Affects Overall Proteasomal Cleavage Site Usage and Antigen Processing.

Kathrin Textoris-Taube, Christin Keller, Juliane Liepe, Petra Henklein, John Sidney, Alessandro Sette, Peter M Kloetzel, Michele Mishto

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Neo-Splicetopes in Tumor Therapy: A Lost Case?Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Response: Commentary: AnFrontiers in immunology · 2021
    Article
  7. Proteasome-GeneratedFrontiers in immunology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Proteolytic dynamics of human 20S thymoproteasome.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Kathrin Textoris-TaubeFrom the Institut für Biochemie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Christin KellerFrom the Institut für Biochemie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Juliane LiepeCentre for Integrative Systems Biology and Bioinformatics, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom, and.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2515-9707
Petra HenkleinFrom the Institut für Biochemie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
John SidneyDivision of Vaccine Discovery, La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, La Jolla, California 92037.
Alessandro SetteDivision of Vaccine Discovery, La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, La Jolla, California 92037.
Peter M KloetzelFrom the Institut für Biochemie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany, p-m.kloetzel@charite.de.
Michele MishtoFrom the Institut für Biochemie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany, michele.mishto@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3042-2792
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DELa Jolla Institute for Immunology · USImperial College London · GB

Funding

National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/K001949/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MHC class I-restricted epitopes, which carry a tumor-specific mutation resulting in improved MHC binding affinity, are preferred T cell receptor targets in innovative adoptive T cell therapies. However, T cell therapy requires efficient generation of the selected epitope. How such mutations may affect proteasome-mediated antigen processing has so far not been studied. Therefore, we analyzed by in vitro experiments the effect on antigen processing and recognition of a T210M exchange, which previously had been introduced into the melanoma gp100209-217 tumor epitope to improve the HLA-A*02:01 binding and its immunogenicity. A quantitative analysis of the main steps of antigen processing shows that the T210M exchange affects proteasomal cleavage site usage within the mutgp100201-230 polypeptide, leading to the generation of an unique set of cleavage products. The T210M substitution qualitatively affects the proteasome-catalyzed generation of spliced and non-spliced peptides predicted to bind HLA-A or -B complexes. The T210M substitution also induces an enhanced production of the mutgp100209-217 epitope and its N-terminally extended peptides. The T210M exchange revealed no effect on ERAP1-mediated N-terminal trimming of the precursor peptides. However, mutant N-terminally extended peptides exhibited significantly increased HLA-A*02:01 binding affinity and elicited CD8(+) T cell stimulation in vitro similar to the wtgp100209-217 epitope. Thus, our experiments demonstrate that amino acid exchanges within an epitope can result in the generation of an altered peptide pool with new antigenic peptides and in a wider CD8(+) T cell response also towards N-terminally extended versions of the minimal epitope.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SubstitutionAntigen PresentationCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCell Line, TransformedCell Line, TumorEpitopes, T-Lymphocytegp100 Melanoma AntigenHLA-A2 AntigenHLA-B AntigensHumansProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexEpitopes, T-Lymphocytegp100 Melanoma AntigenHLA-A*02:01 antigenHLA-A2 AntigenHLA-B AntigensProteasome Endopeptidase Complexantigen presentationantigen processingmutantprotein degradationubiquitin-dependent protease

Identifiers

PMID26507656
PMCPMC4683264
OpenAlexW2255207203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.