Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2650757›Full record

ReviewBlut1989

Polypeptides controlling hematopoietic blood cell development and activation. II. Clinical results.

F Herrmann, A Lindemann, R Mertelsmann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Blut, 1989. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

F HerrmannDepartment of Hematology, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz, Federal Republic of Germany.
A Lindemann
R Mertelsmann
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) have entered the clinical arena. Several investigators have explored, in first clinical phase I studies, different routes of administration to define the optimum biological dose, maximum tolerated dose, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of these reagents. It has been demonstrated that recombinant human (rh) granulocyte-macrophage CSF (GM-CSF) and granulocyte CSF (G-CSF) can be safely administered over a broad dose range to increase number of circulating granulocytes in man. More recently, GM-CSF and G-CSF have been involved in phase Ib/II studies to assess the granulopoietic responses of patients with granulocytopenia due to various underlying disease states including myelodysplastic syndrome, aplastic anemia, cyclic neutropenia, Kostmann's syndrome, and the acquired immuno-deficiency syndrome. Both factors were also investigated with respect to their potential to prevent chemotherapy induced granulocytopenia or to accelerate recovery from that condition. The short-term effects of rh GM-CSF after autologous bone marrow transplantation for various solid tumors and lymphoid malignancies were assessed as well. In this article we will focus on recent results that have emerged from in vivo studies utilizing CSFs.

Indexed as

Bone MarrowColony-Stimulating FactorsDrug EvaluationHematopoiesisHematopoietic Stem CellsHumansPeptidesColony-Stimulating FactorsPeptides

Identifiers

PMID2650757
OpenAlexW2315627615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.