Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26507229›Full record

ArticlemBio2015

Identification of Population Bottlenecks and Colonization Factors during Assembly of Bacterial Communities within the Zebrafish Intestine.

W Zac Stephens, Travis J Wiles, Emily S Martinez, Matthew Jemielita, Adam R Burns, Raghuveer Parthasarathy, Brendan J M Bohannan, Karen Guillemin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. DRIVERS OF VARIATION OF THE ZEBRAFISH EGG MICROBIOME.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Features and Colonization Strategies ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Probiotic Yeasts andFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

W Zac StephensInstitute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8072-9023
Travis J WilesInstitute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.
Emily S MartinezDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.
Matthew JemielitaDepartment of Physics, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.
Adam R BurnsInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.
Raghuveer ParthasarathyDepartment of Physics, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.
Brendan J M BohannanInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.
Karen GuilleminInstitute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA guillemin@molbio.uoregon.edu.
University of Oregon · US

Funding

Zebrafish FacilityP01HD022486 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI EISEN, JUDITH S · 1987 to 2017
$28.8M
Research Area IIIP50GM098911 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI PARTHASARATHY, RAGHUVEER · 2012 to 2016
$9.8M
Microbial Ecology of the Zebrafish IntestineR01GM095385 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI BOHANNAN, BRENDAN, GUILLEMIN, KAREN J · 2011 to 2014
$1.4M
Elucidation of Host and Bacterial Factors that Influence Resilience and RobustnesF32AI112094 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI WILES, TRAVIS J · 2014 to 2016
$164k
NIAID NIH HHS F32 AI112094NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD022486NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM098911NIGMS NIH HHS P50GM098911NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM095385NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM095385
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThe zebrafish, Danio rerio, is a powerful model for studying bacterial colonization of the vertebrate intestine, but the genes required by commensal bacteria to colonize the zebrafish gut have not yet been interrogated on a genome-wide level. Here we apply a high-throughput transposon mutagenesis screen to Aeromonas veronii Hm21 and Vibrio sp. strain ZWU0020 during their colonization of the zebrafish intestine alone and in competition with each other, as well as in different colonization orders. We use these transposon-tagged libraries to track bacterial population sizes in different colonization regimes and to identify gene functions required during these processes. We show that intraspecific, but not interspecific, competition with a previously established bacterial population greatly reduces the ability of these two bacterial species to colonize. Further, using a simple binomial sampling model, we show that under conditions of interspecific competition, genes required for colonization cannot be identified because of the population bottleneck experienced by the second colonizer. When bacteria colonize the intestine alone or at the same time as the other species, we find shared suites of functional requirements for colonization by the two species, including a prominent role for chemotaxis and motility, regardless of the presence of another species. IMPORTANCE: Zebrafish larvae, which are amenable to large-scale gnotobiotic studies, comprehensive sampling of their intestinal microbiota, and live imaging, are an excellent model for investigations of vertebrate intestinal colonization dynamics. We sought to develop a mutagenesis and tagging system in order to understand bacterial population dynamics and functional requirements during colonization of the larval zebrafish intestine. We explored changes in bacterial colonization dynamics and functional requirements when bacteria colonize a bacterium-free intestine, one previously colonized by their own species, or one colonized previously or simultaneously with a different species. This work provides a framework for rapid identification of colonization factors important under different colonization conditions. Furthermore, we demonstrate that when colonizing bacterial populations are very small, this approach is not accurate because random sampling of the input pool is sufficient to explain the distribution of inserts recovered from bacteria that colonized the intestines.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAeromonasAnimalsDNA Transposable ElementsGerm-Free LifeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingIntestinesLarvaMicrobial ConsortiaMicrobial InteractionsModels, AnimalMutagenesisVibrioZebrafishDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID26507229
PMCPMC4626852
OpenAlexW2177902043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.