Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26506992›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2016

Gender differences in the effect of social support on health-related quality of life: results of a population-based prospective cohort study in old age in Germany.

André Hajek, Christian Brettschneider, Carolin Lange, Tina Posselt, Birgitt Wiese, Susanne Steinmann, Siegfried Weyerer, Jochen Werle, Michael Pentzek, Angela Fuchs and 10 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Social factors of health-related quality of life in older adults: a multivariable analysis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  9. The relationship between social support, self-efficacy, and asthma outcomes in older adults.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Social support and links to quality of life among middle-aged and older autistic adults.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Social support and health-related quality of life among the oldest old - longitudinal evidence from the multicenter prospective AgeCoDe-AgeQualiDe study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

André HajekDepartment of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. a.hajek@uke.de.
Christian BrettschneiderDepartment of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Carolin LangeDepartment of Primary Medical Care, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Tina PosseltDepartment of Primary Medical Care, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Birgitt WieseWG Medical Statistics and IT-Infrastructure, Institute of General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Susanne SteinmannWG Medical Statistics and IT-Infrastructure, Institute of General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Siegfried WeyererCentral Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Jochen WerleCentral Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Michael PentzekInstitute of General Practice, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Angela FuchsInstitute of General Practice, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Janine SteinInstitute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Tobias LuckInstitute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Horst BickelDepartment of Psychiatry, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Edelgard MöschDepartment of Psychiatry, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Steffen WolfsgruberDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Kathrin HeserDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Wolfgang MaierDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Martin SchererDepartment of Primary Medical Care, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Steffi G Riedel-HellerInstitute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Hans-Helmut KönigDepartment of Health Economics and Health Services Research, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DELeipzig University · DEHeidelberg University · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DETechnical University of Munich · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Bonn · DEGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe causality between social predictors and HRQoL in old age remains almost unclear as only a few studies have examined the influence of social support on HRQoL in a longitudinal setting. Moreover, available studies investigating gender differences in the effect of social support on HRQoL in old age have been solely cross-sectional. Consequently, the aim of this study was to examine whether social support affects health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in old age and whether this effect is moderated by gender.

methodsIn a population-based cohort (N = 2443) of people aged 75 years and older in Germany, the development of HRQoL was prospectively observed over a 3-year period. Quality of life was quantified by using the visual analogue scale of the EQ-5D instrument. Social support was assessed by using the 14-item form of the questionnaire for social support (F-SozU K-14). In order to control for unobserved heterogeneity, fixed-effects regression analysis was used.

resultsIn the total sample (β = 0.55, p < 0.05) and in men (β = 1.39, p < 0.001), a strong positive impact of social support on HRQoL was found. There was no significant effect of social support on HRQoL in women. The effect of social support on HRQoL was significantly moderated by gender (p < 0.05).

conclusionsFindings accentuate the fundamental role of social support in HRQoL in old age. Particularly in men, it is therefore crucial to strengthen the social ties in old age.

Indexed as

Health StatusQuality of LifeSelf ReportSocial SupportAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHealth ServicesHumansMalePain MeasurementProspective StudiesSex FactorsGender differencesHealth-related quality of lifeInteractionLongitudinalOlder peopleSocial support

Identifiers

PMID26506992
OpenAlexW1840140394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.