Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26506931›Full record

ReviewBiogerontology2016

A reduced activity model: a relevant tool for the study of ageing muscle.

Oliver Perkin, Polly McGuigan, Dylan Thompson, Keith Stokes

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biogerontology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Physiology of sedentary behavior.Physiological reviews · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. PGC-1α-Targeted Therapeutic Approaches to Enhance Muscle Recovery in Aging.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Oliver PerkinDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Polly McGuiganDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Dylan ThompsonDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Keith StokesDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK. k.stokes@bath.ac.uk.
University of Bath · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skeletal muscle mass is in a constant state of turnover, and atrophy is the result of a shift in the balance of muscle protein synthesis and breakdown resulting in net muscle protein loss. Total disuse of skeletal muscle quickly leads to muscle atrophy and loss of strength, and this has been repeatedly demonstrated in studies employing bed rest and lower limb immobilisation methodologies in young healthy participants. Fewer studies have focused on older participants (>65 years of age), but those that have provide evidence that advancing age brings increased vulnerability to rapid and marked loss of muscle size and strength during period of total muscle unloading. Increased systemic inflammation and reduced protein synthetic responses to protein feeding and muscle contraction might influence the severity of muscle protein loss during periods of total unloading compared with younger individuals. Less extreme reductions in muscle loading (e.g., 2 weeks of reducing daily ambulation to <1500 steps/day) have also been shown to result in decreases in muscle mass. This step-reduction model may be more relevant than total bed rest or limb immobilisation for examining real-world scenarios that present a physiological challenge to the maintenance of skeletal muscle mass in older individuals.

Indexed as

Sedentary BehaviorAgedAged, 80 and overAgingEvidence-Based MedicineExerciseFemaleHumansMaleMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthMuscular AtrophyAgeingAtrophyInactivityMuscleStep-reductionStrength

Identifiers

PMID26506931
PMCPMC4889637
OpenAlexW2170627826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.