Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26506533›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2015

Predicting the Effect of Mutations on Protein-Protein Binding Interactions through Structure-Based Interface Profiles.

Jeffrey R Brender, Yang Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 145 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. FoldX force field revisited, an improved version.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Biomolecular Topology: Modelling and Analysis.Acta mathematica Sinica, English series · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeffrey R BrenderDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Yang ZhangDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America; Department of Biological Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Michigan United · US

Funding

I-TASSER based atomic-level protein structure predictionR01GM083107 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ZHANG, YANG · 2008 to 2019
$3.5M
Template-based docking refinement approach to protein-protein structure modelingR01GM116960 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ZHANG, YANG · 2016 to 2019
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM083107NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083107NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM116960
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The formation of protein-protein complexes is essential for proteins to perform their physiological functions in the cell. Mutations that prevent the proper formation of the correct complexes can have serious consequences for the associated cellular processes. Since experimental determination of protein-protein binding affinity remains difficult when performed on a large scale, computational methods for predicting the consequences of mutations on binding affinity are highly desirable. We show that a scoring function based on interface structure profiles collected from analogous protein-protein interactions in the PDB is a powerful predictor of protein binding affinity changes upon mutation. As a standalone feature, the differences between the interface profile score of the mutant and wild-type proteins has an accuracy equivalent to the best all-atom potentials, despite being two orders of magnitude faster once the profile has been constructed. Due to its unique sensitivity in collecting the evolutionary profiles of analogous binding interactions and the high speed of calculation, the interface profile score has additional advantages as a complementary feature to combine with physics-based potentials for improving the accuracy of composite scoring approaches. By incorporating the sequence-derived and residue-level coarse-grained potentials with the interface structure profile score, a composite model was constructed through the random forest training, which generates a Pearson correlation coefficient >0.8 between the predicted and observed binding free-energy changes upon mutation. This accuracy is comparable to, or outperforms in most cases, the current best methods, but does not require high-resolution full-atomic models of the mutant structures. The binding interface profiling approach should find useful application in human-disease mutation recognition and protein interface design studies.

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalModels, GeneticAmino Acid SequenceBinding SitesModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataMutationProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein Interaction MappingProteinsSequence Analysis, ProteinStructure-Activity RelationshipProteins

Identifiers

PMID26506533
PMCPMC4624718
OpenAlexW1823111029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.