Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26506381›Full record

ReviewNutrients2015

The Spectrum of Differences between Childhood and Adulthood Celiac Disease.

Rachele Ciccocioppo, Peter Kruzliak, Giuseppina C Cangemi, Miroslav Pohanka, Elena Betti, Eugenia Lauret, Luis Rodrigo

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Rapidly progressive dementia and intractable diarrhea: a teaching case report and a systematic review of cognitive impairment in Whipple's disease.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Combined ProbioticMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The global burden of coeliac disease: opportunities and challenges.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2022
    Review
  16. Celiac Disease Revisited.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Rachele CiccocioppoRachele Ciccocioppo, Center for the Study and Cure of Celiac Disease, Clinica Medica I, Department of Internal Medicine, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, University of Pavia, 19-27100 Pavia, Italy. rachele.ciccocioppo@unipv.it.
Peter KruzliakInternational Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital and Masaryk University, 65691 Brno, Czech Republic. peter.kruzliak@savba.sk.
Giuseppina C CangemiRachele Ciccocioppo, Center for the Study and Cure of Celiac Disease, Clinica Medica I, Department of Internal Medicine, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, University of Pavia, 19-27100 Pavia, Italy. cangemi.giusy@gmail.com.
Miroslav PohankaFaculty of Military Health Sciences, University of Defence, Trebešská 1575-500 01 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. miroslav.pohanka@gmail.com.
Elena BettiRachele Ciccocioppo, Center for the Study and Cure of Celiac Disease, Clinica Medica I, Department of Internal Medicine, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, University of Pavia, 19-27100 Pavia, Italy. elena.betti19@gmail.com.
Eugenia LauretGastroenterology Unit, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, 33000 Oviedo, Spain. meugelb@hotmail.com.
Luis RodrigoGastroenterology Unit, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, 33000 Oviedo, Spain. lrodrigosaez@gmail.com.
University of Pavia · ITHospital Universitario Central de Asturias · ESMasaryk University · CZUniversity of Defence · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An old saying states that ''children are not little adults" and this certainly holds true for celiac disease, as there are many peculiar aspects regarding its epidemiology, diagnosis, clinical presentations, associated diseases, and response to treatment in pediatric compared to adult populations, to such an extent that it merits a description of its own. In fact, contrary to the past when it was thought that celiac disease was a disorder predominantly affecting childhood and characterized by a malabsorption syndrome, nowadays it is well recognized that it affects also adult and elderly people with an impressive variability of clinical presentation. In general, the clinical guidelines for diagnosis recommend starting with specific serologic testing in all suspected subjects, including those suffering from extraintestinal related conditions, and performing upper endoscopy with appropriate biopsy sampling of duodenal mucosa in case of positivity. The latter may be omitted in young patients showing high titers of anti-transglutaminase antibodies. The subsequent management of a celiac patient differs substantially depending on the age at diagnosis and should be based on the important consideration that this is a lifelong condition.

Indexed as

Age FactorsCeliac DiseaseAdultChildClinical ProtocolsHumansadulthoodassociated diseaseschildhoodcomplications.

Identifiers

PMID26506381
PMCPMC4632446
OpenAlexW1827335832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.