Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26506377›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2015

Consumption of Milk Protein or Whey Protein Results in a Similar Increase in Muscle Protein Synthesis in Middle Aged Men.

Cameron J Mitchell, Robin A McGregor, Randall F D'Souza, Eric B Thorstensen, James F Markworth, Aaron C Fanning, Sally D Poppitt, David Cameron-Smith

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Ingestion of 'whole cell' or 'split cell'Frontiers in nutrition · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Cameron J MitchellLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. cameron.mitchell@auckland.ac.nz.
Robin A McGregorSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. robinmcgregor@gmail.com.
Randall F D'SouzaLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. r.dsouza@auckland.ac.nz.
Eric B ThorstensenLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. e.thorstensen@auckland.ac.nz.
James F MarkworthLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. j.markworth@auckland.ac.nz.
Aaron C FanningFonterra Research and Development Centre, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand. Aaron.Fanning@fonterra.com.
Sally D PoppittSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. s.poppitt@auckland.ac.nz.
David Cameron-SmithLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. d.cameron-smith@auckland.ac.nz.
University of Auckland · NZFonterra (New Zealand) · NZInje University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The differential ability of various milk protein fractions to stimulate muscle protein synthesis (MPS) has been previously described, with whey protein generally considered to be superior to other fractions. However, the relative ability of a whole milk protein to stimulate MPS has not been compared to whey. Sixteen healthy middle-aged males ingested either 20 g of milk protein (n = 8) or whey protein (n = 8) while undergoing a primed constant infusion of ring (13)C₆ phenylalanine. Muscle biopsies were obtained 120 min prior to consumption of the protein and 90 and 210 min afterwards. Resting myofibrillar fractional synthetic rates (FSR) were 0.019% ± 0.009% and 0.021% ± 0.018% h(-1) in the milk and whey groups respectively. For the first 90 min after protein ingestion the FSR increased (p < 0.001) to 0.057% ± 0.018% and 0.052% ± 0.024% h(-1) in the milk and whey groups respectively with no difference between groups (p = 0.810). FSR returned to baseline in both groups between 90 and 210 min after protein ingestion. Despite evidence of increased rate of digestion and leucine availability following the ingestion of whey protein, there was similar activation of MPS in middle-aged men with either 20 g of milk protein or whey protein.

Indexed as

HumansMaleMiddle AgedMilk ProteinsMuscle ProteinsMusclesMyofibrilsProtein BiosynthesisWhey ProteinsMilk ProteinsMuscle ProteinsWhey Proteinsamino acidsfractional synthetic ratemilk proteinmusclestable isotopeswhey protein

Identifiers

PMID26506377
PMCPMC4632440
OpenAlexW1895513606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.