SynthesisThe Journal of perinatal & neonatal nursing
A Systematic Review: The Utility of the Revised Version of the Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology Among Critically Ill Neonates.
Synthesis in The Journal of perinatal & neonatal nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mortality Risk Factors and Survival Outcomes in Infants with Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Clearance and nutrition in neonatal continuous kidney replacement therapy using the Carpediem™ system.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2024Observational
- Neonatal transport practices and effectiveness of the use of low-cost interventions on outcomes of transported neonates in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Identification of the Best Predictive Model for Mortality in Outborn Neonates-Retrospective Cohort Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Change in Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology-II Measurements for Prediction of Mortality in Severely Septic Preterm Neonates.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2023Article
- Neonatal outcomes of twins <29 weeks gestation of mothers with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.Pediatric research · 2022Article
- Comparative Performance of Four Established Neonatal Disease Scoring Systems in Predicting In-Hospital Mortality and the Potential Role of Thromboelastometry.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Predictive Ability of an Illness Severity Measure: Implications for Nursing Research.Journal of nursing measurement · 2021Article
- Necrotizing enterocolitis: It's not all in the gut.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2020Review
- Admission hypothermia, neonatal morbidity, and mortality: evaluation of a multicenter cohort of very low birth weight preterm infants according to relative performance of the center.European journal of pediatrics · 2019Article
- Neonatal outcomes of extremely preterm infants exposed to maternal hypertension and cigarette smoking.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The revised version of the Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology (SNAP-II) has been used across all birth weights and gestational ages to measure the concept of severity of illness in critically ill neonates. The SNAP-II has been operationalized in various ways across research studies. This systematic review seeks to synthesize the available research regarding the utility of this instrument, specifically on the utility of measuring severity of illness sequentially and at later time points. A systematic review was performed and identified 35 research articles that met inclusion and exclusion criteria. The majority of the studies used the SNAP-II instrument as a measure of initial severity of illness on the first day of life. Six studies utilized the SNAP-II instrument to measure severity of illness at later time points and only 2 studies utilized the instrument to prospectively measure severity of illness. Evidence to support the use of the SNAP-II at later time points and prospectively is lacking and more evidence is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.