Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26505810›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiac failure2016

Comparing Perspectives of Patients, Caregivers, and Clinicians on Heart Failure Management.

Faraz S Ahmad, Frances K Barg, Kathryn H Bowles, Madeline Alexander, Lee R Goldberg, Benjamin French, Shreya Kangovi, Thomas R Gallagher, Breah Paciotti, Stephen E Kimmel

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiac failure, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Faraz S AhmadNorthwestern University, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: faraz.ahmad@northwestern.edu.
Frances K BargUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Kathryn H BowlesUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Madeline AlexanderUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Lee R GoldbergUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Benjamin FrenchUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Shreya KangoviUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Thomas R GallagherUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Breah PaciottiUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Stephen E KimmelUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN CVD EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PREVENTIONT32HL069771 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Mercedes Renee Carnethon · 2003 to 2026
$5.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL069771NHLBI NIH HHS T32HL069771
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough substantial effort has been devoted to reducing readmissions among heart failure (HF) patients, little is known about factors identified by patients and caregivers that may contribute to readmissions. The goal of this study was to compare the perspectives of HF patients, their caregivers, and their care team on HF management and hospital admissions. Understanding these perspectives may lead to better strategies for improving care during the post-hospital transition and for reducing preventable readmissions. METHODS AND

resultsWe performed freelisting, an anthropologic technique in which participants list items in response to a question, with hospitalized HF patients (n = 58), their caregivers (n = 32), and clinicians (n = 67). We asked about home HF management tasks, difficulties in managing HF, and perceived reasons for hospital admission. Results were analyzed with the use of Anthropac. Salience indices (measures of the most important words for defining the domain of interest) were calculated. Patients and clinicians described similar home HF management tasks, whereas caregivers described tasks related to activities of daily living. Clinicians cited socioeconomic factors as challenges to HF management, whereas patients and caregivers cited limited functional status and daily activities. When asked about reasons for hospitalization, patients and caregivers listed distressing symptoms and illness, whereas clinicians viewed patient behaviors to be primarily responsible for admission.

conclusionsThese findings highlight that although some similarities exist, there are important differences among patients, caregivers, and clinicians in how they perceive the challenges of HF management and reasons for readmission. Understanding these differences may be critical to developing strategies to reduce readmissions.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementPatient SatisfactionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversFemaleHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysician's RoleSurveys and QuestionnairesHeart failurepatient-centered carequalitative researchreadmissionstransitional care

Identifiers

PMID26505810
PMCPMC4847723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.