Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26505758›Full record

ReviewJournal of medicinal chemistry2016

Can Invalid Bioactives Undermine Natural Product-Based Drug Discovery?

Jonathan Bisson, James B McAlpine, J Brent Friesen, Shao-Nong Chen, James Graham, Guido F Pauli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medicinal chemistry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Antiparasitic Potential of Bioactive Compounds FromJournal of parasitology research · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jonathan Bisson
James B McAlpine
J Brent FriesenPhysical Sciences Department, Rosary College of Arts and Sciences, Dominican University , River Forest, Illinois 60305, United States.
Shao-Nong Chen
James Graham
Guido F Pauli

Funding

Van Breemen: Project 3; Botanical Dietary Supplements - Metabolism and Safety in Women (Van Breemen)P50AT000155 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI PAULI, GUIDO F · 1999 to 2019
$30.4M
Research Training in Natural Product Complementary and Integrative HealthT32AT007533 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI Joanna E Burdette, JIMMY ORJALA · 2013 to 2026
$4.3M
Multidisciplinary Oral Science TrainingT32DE018381 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI COOPER, LYNDON F · 2008 to 2019
$3.6M
Biomodification of Dentin Matrix StructureR01DE021040 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI BEDRAN-RUSSO, ANA KARINA B · 2011 to 2015
$2.1M
Center for Natural Product Technologies at UIC (CeNAPT)U41AT008706 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI PAULI, GUIDO F · 2015 to 2019
$1.5M
Spectrometric Validation of Botanical Materials and Reference StandardsRC2AT005899 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI PAULI, GUIDO F · 2009 to 2010
$1.2M
Automated technology for purification of active ingredients in natural productsR44AT004534 · NCCIH · WRIGHTWOOD TECHNOLOGIES INC. · PI PAULI, GUIDO F, PRO, SAMUEL MICHAEL · 2010 to 2011
$745k
Development of a transformative approach to the rapid detection, isolation, and iR21AI093919 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI JAKI, BIRGIT URSULA · 2012 to 2013
$401k
EVALUATION OF ALASKAN PLANTS FOR TUBERCULOSIS TREATMENTR43AT001758 · NCCIH · ALASKA GREEN GOLD COMPANY · PI SMITH, DAVID C · 2003 to 2003
$140k
NCCIH NIH HHS P50 AT000155NCCIH NIH HHS R43 AT001758NCCIH NIH HHS R44 AT004534NCCIH NIH HHS RC2 AT005899NCCIH NIH HHS T32 AT007533NCCIH NIH HHS T32AT007533NCCIH NIH HHS U41 AT008706NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI093919NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI82847NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE021040NIDCR NIH HHS T32 DE018381
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput biology has contributed a wealth of data on chemicals, including natural products (NPs). Recently, attention was drawn to certain, predominantly synthetic, compounds that are responsible for disproportionate percentages of hits but are false actives. Spurious bioassay interference led to their designation as pan-assay interference compounds (PAINS). NPs lack comparable scrutiny, which this study aims to rectify. Systematic mining of 80+ years of the phytochemistry and biology literature, using the NAPRALERT database, revealed that only 39 compounds represent the NPs most reported by occurrence, activity, and distinct activity. Over 50% are not explained by phenomena known for synthetic libraries, and all had manifold ascribed bioactivities, designating them as invalid metabolic panaceas (IMPs). Cumulative distributions of ∼200,000 NPs uncovered that NP research follows power-law characteristics typical for behavioral phenomena. Projection into occurrence-bioactivity-effort space produces the hyperbolic black hole of NPs, where IMPs populate the high-effort base.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryBiological ProductsHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysReproducibility of ResultsBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID26505758
PMCPMC4791574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.