Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26505702›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery2015

Dermal Fibroblasts from the Red Duroc Pig Have an Inherently Fibrogenic Phenotype: An In Vitro Model of Fibroproliferative Scarring.

Ravi F Sood, Lara A Muffley, Max E Seaton, Maricar Ga, Pornthep Sirimahachaiyakul, Anne M Hocking, Nicole S Gibran

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of Superficial and Deep Partial-Thickness Burn Wounds in Yorkshire vs Red Duroc Pigs.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. In-depth examination of hyperproliferative healing in two breeds ofAnimal models and experimental medicine · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ravi F SoodSeattle, Wash.; Baltimore, Md.; and Bangkok, Thailand From the Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medicine Regional Burn Center, Harborview Medical Center; the Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine; and the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University.
Lara A Muffley
Max E Seaton
Maricar Ga
Pornthep Sirimahachaiyakul
Anne M Hocking
Nicole S Gibran
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

TRAUMA AND BURNST32GM007037 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI O'KEEFE, GRANT E · 1985 to 2014
$3.3M
Response to Burn Injury: Role of the Melanocortin System in Wound RepairR01GM089704 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GIBRAN, NICOLE SIMONE · 2010 to 2013
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM089704NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe pathophysiology of hypertrophic scarring is unknown in part because of the lack of a robust animal model. Although the red Duroc pig has emerged as a promising in vivo model, the cellular mechanisms underlying Duroc scarring are unknown, and the size and cost of Duroc pigs are obstacles to their use. Given the central role of the dermal fibroblast in scarring, the authors hypothesized that dermal fibroblasts from the Duroc pig exhibit intrinsic differences in key aspects of the fibroblast response to injury compared with those from the Yorkshire pig, a same-species control that heals normally.

methodsDuroc and Yorkshire dermal fibroblasts were isolated from uninjured dorsal skin. Actin stress fibers and focal adhesions were visualized by immunocytochemistry and transmission electron microscopy. Cell migration was measured using a scratch wound-closure assay. Contractile function was assessed by collagen gel contraction. Expression of scarring-related genes was determined by quantitative real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 protein expression was determined by Western blotting.

resultsDuroc dermal fibroblasts display increased adhesion-complex formation, impaired migration, enhanced collagen contraction, and profibrotic gene and protein expression profiles compared with Yorkshire fibroblasts at baseline. In addition, Duroc fibroblasts overexpressed TGF-β1 and were less responsive to exogenous TGF-β1.

conclusionsDuroc dermal fibroblasts have inherent myofibroblastic differentiation that may account for the pathologic scarring in these animals. The authors' data further validate the Duroc model and support Duroc fibroblast cell culture as a simple, inexpensive, reproducible, and biologically tractable in vitro model for the study of fibroproliferative scarring.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationAnimalsBlotting, WesternCell AdhesionCell MovementCell ProliferationCells, CulturedCicatrix, HypertrophicDisease Models, AnimalFemaleFibroblastsIn Vitro TechniquesMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionPhenotypeReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSpecies SpecificityTransforming Growth Factor beta1

Identifiers

PMID26505702
PMCPMC4624253
OpenAlexW2443527609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.