ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery2015
Dermal Fibroblasts from the Red Duroc Pig Have an Inherently Fibrogenic Phenotype: An In Vitro Model of Fibroproliferative Scarring.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of Superficial and Deep Partial-Thickness Burn Wounds in Yorkshire vs Red Duroc Pigs.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2022Article
- Donor Age and Time in Culture Affect Dermal Fibroblast Contraction in anTissue engineering. Part A · 2022Article
- In-depth examination of hyperproliferative healing in two breeds ofAnimal models and experimental medicine · 2021Article
- Hypertrophic scarring: the greatest unmet challenge after burn injury.Lancet (London, England) · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe pathophysiology of hypertrophic scarring is unknown in part because of the lack of a robust animal model. Although the red Duroc pig has emerged as a promising in vivo model, the cellular mechanisms underlying Duroc scarring are unknown, and the size and cost of Duroc pigs are obstacles to their use. Given the central role of the dermal fibroblast in scarring, the authors hypothesized that dermal fibroblasts from the Duroc pig exhibit intrinsic differences in key aspects of the fibroblast response to injury compared with those from the Yorkshire pig, a same-species control that heals normally.
methodsDuroc and Yorkshire dermal fibroblasts were isolated from uninjured dorsal skin. Actin stress fibers and focal adhesions were visualized by immunocytochemistry and transmission electron microscopy. Cell migration was measured using a scratch wound-closure assay. Contractile function was assessed by collagen gel contraction. Expression of scarring-related genes was determined by quantitative real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 protein expression was determined by Western blotting.
resultsDuroc dermal fibroblasts display increased adhesion-complex formation, impaired migration, enhanced collagen contraction, and profibrotic gene and protein expression profiles compared with Yorkshire fibroblasts at baseline. In addition, Duroc fibroblasts overexpressed TGF-β1 and were less responsive to exogenous TGF-β1.
conclusionsDuroc dermal fibroblasts have inherent myofibroblastic differentiation that may account for the pathologic scarring in these animals. The authors' data further validate the Duroc model and support Duroc fibroblast cell culture as a simple, inexpensive, reproducible, and biologically tractable in vitro model for the study of fibroproliferative scarring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.