ArticlePLoS computational biology2015
ENCORE: Software for Quantitative Ensemble Comparison.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unsupervised synchronization of molecular dynamics trajectories via graph embedding and time warping.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- EncoderMap III: A Dimensionality Reduction Package for Feature Exploration in Molecular Simulations.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Denaturation of firefly luciferase at heat shock temperatures captured in silico.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
- Structural insights into two thiamine diphosphate-dependent enzymes and their synthetic applications in carbon-carbon linkage reactions.Nature chemistry · 2025Article
- Umbrella Refinement of Ensembles-An Alternative View of Ensemble Optimization.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Systematic analysis of biomolecular conformational ensembles with PENSA.The Journal of chemical physics · 2025Article
- Rescaling protein-protein interactions improves Martini 3 for flexible proteins in solution.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Efficient Refinement of Complex Structures of Flexible Histone Peptides Using Post-Docking Molecular Dynamics Protocols.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Multilevel superposition for deciphering the conformational variability of protein ensembles.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Protein ensemble modeling and analysis with MMMx.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024Article
- Optimizing Epitope Conformational Ensembles Using α-Synuclein Cyclic Peptide "Glycindel" Scaffolds: A Customized Immunogen Method for Generating Oligomer-Selective Antibodies for Parkinson's Disease.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2022Article
- Protein dynamics developments for the large scale and cryoEM: case study of ProDy 2.0.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2022Review
- The importance of the compact disordered state in the fuzzy interactions between intrinsically disordered proteins.Chemical science · 2022Article
- MgeLife · 2022Article
- Integrative Conformational Ensembles of Sic1 Using Different Initial Pools and Optimization Methods.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Article
- Higher Affinity Antibodies Bind With Lower Hydration and Flexibility in Large Scale Simulations.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Cryo-EM structure of human Pol κ bound to DNA and mono-ubiquitylated PCNA.Nature communications · 2021Article
- The conformational and mutational landscape of the ubiquitin-like marker for autophagosome formation in cancer.Autophagy · 2021Article
- Article
- Finding Druggable Sites in Proteins Using TACTICS.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is increasing evidence that protein dynamics and conformational changes can play an important role in modulating biological function. As a result, experimental and computational methods are being developed, often synergistically, to study the dynamical heterogeneity of a protein or other macromolecules in solution. Thus, methods such as molecular dynamics simulations or ensemble refinement approaches have provided conformational ensembles that can be used to understand protein function and biophysics. These developments have in turn created a need for algorithms and software that can be used to compare structural ensembles in the same way as the root-mean-square-deviation is often used to compare static structures. Although a few such approaches have been proposed, these can be difficult to implement efficiently, hindering a broader applications and further developments. Here, we present an easily accessible software toolkit, called ENCORE, which can be used to compare conformational ensembles generated either from simulations alone or synergistically with experiments. ENCORE implements three previously described methods for ensemble comparison, that each can be used to quantify the similarity between conformational ensembles by estimating the overlap between the probability distributions that underlie them. We demonstrate the kinds of insights that can be obtained by providing examples of three typical use-cases: comparing ensembles generated with different molecular force fields, assessing convergence in molecular simulations, and calculating differences and similarities in structural ensembles refined with various sources of experimental data. We also demonstrate efficient computational scaling for typical analyses, and robustness against both the size and sampling of the ensembles. ENCORE is freely available and extendable, integrates with the established MDAnalysis software package, reads ensemble data in many common formats, and can work with large trajectory files.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.