Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26505477›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

A Network Approach to Bipolar Symptomatology in Patients with Different Course Types.

M A Koenders, R de Kleijn, E J Giltay, B M Elzinga, P Spinhoven, A T Spijker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Anticipating depression trajectories by measuring plasticity and change through symptom network dynamics.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A network structure of manic symptoms.Brain and behavior · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Mental disorders as networks of problems: a review of recent insights.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M A KoendersLeiden University, Institute of Psychology, Section of Clinical Psychology, Leiden, The Netherlands; PsyQ Rijnmond, Department of mood and anxiety disorders, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
R de KleijnLeiden University, Institute of Psychology, Cognitive Psychology Unit, Leiden, The Netherlands.
E J GiltayLeiden University Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry, Leiden, The Netherlands.
B M ElzingaLeiden University, Institute of Psychology, Section of Clinical Psychology, Leiden, The Netherlands.
P SpinhovenLeiden University, Institute of Psychology, Section of Clinical Psychology, Leiden, The Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry, Leiden, The Netherlands.
A T SpijkerPsyQ Rijnmond, Department of mood and anxiety disorders, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
GGD Rotterdam-Rijnmond · NLLeiden University · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe longitudinal mood course is highly variable among patients with bipolar disorder(BD). One of the strongest predictors of the future disease course is the past disease course, implying that the vulnerability for developing a specific pattern of symptoms is rather consistent over time. We therefore investigated whether BD patients with different longitudinal course types have symptom correlation networks with typical characteristics. To this end we used network analysis, a rather novel approach in the field of psychiatry.

methodBased on two-year monthly life charts, 125 patients with complete 2 year data were categorized into three groups: i.e., a minimally impaired (n = 47), a predominantly depressed (n = 42) and a cycling course (n = 36). Associations between symptoms were defined as the groupwise Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between each pair of items of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS). Weighted symptom networks and centrality measures were compared among the three groups.

resultsThe weighted networks significantly differed among the three groups, with manic and depressed symptoms being most strongly interconnected in the cycling group. The symptoms with top centrality that were most interconnected also differed among the course group; central symptoms in the stable group were elevated mood and increased speech, in the depressed group loss of self-esteem and psychomotor slowness, and in the cycling group concentration loss and suicidality.

conclusionSymptom networks based on the timepoints with most severe symptoms of bipolar patients with different longitudinal course types are significantly different. The clinical interpretation of this finding and its implications are discussed.

Indexed as

PsychometricsSuicideAdultAffectBipolar DisorderFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersonality InventoryPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSelf ConceptSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID26505477
PMCPMC4624774
OpenAlexW1879403549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.