Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26505271›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2016

Pharmacological treatment of cardiac glycoside poisoning.

Darren M Roberts, Gamini Gallapatthy, Asunga Dunuwille, Betty S Chan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Toxidromes.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Poisoning byAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Toxicity of herbal medications suggested as treatment for COVID-19: A narrative review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Darren M RobertsMedical School, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia, 2603.
Gamini GallapatthyCardiology, National Hospital of Sri Lanka, Colombo, Sri Lanka and.
Asunga DunuwilleCardiology, National Hospital of Sri Lanka, Colombo, Sri Lanka and.
Betty S ChanClinical Toxicology and Emergency Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
National Hospital of Sri Lanka · LKPrince of Wales Hospital · AURoyal Prince Alfred Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac glycosides are an important cause of poisoning, reflecting their widespread clinical usage and presence in natural sources. Poisoning can manifest as varying degrees of toxicity. Predominant clinical features include gastrointestinal signs, bradycardia and heart block. Death occurs from ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia. A wide range of treatments have been used, the more common including activated charcoal, atropine, β-adrenoceptor agonists, temporary pacing, anti-digoxin Fab and magnesium, and more novel agents include fructose-1,6-diphosphate (clinical trial in progress) and anticalin. However, even in the case of those treatments that have been in use for decades, there is debate regarding their efficacy, the indications and dosage that optimizes outcomes. This contributes to variability in use across the world. Another factor influencing usage is access. Barriers to access include the requirement for transfer to a specialized centre (for example, to receive temporary pacing) or financial resources (for example, anti-digoxin Fab in resource poor countries). Recent data suggest that existing methods for calculating the dose of anti-digoxin Fab in digoxin poisoning overstate the dose required, and that its efficacy may be minimal in patients with chronic digoxin poisoning. Cheaper and effective medicines are required, in particular for the treatment of yellow oleander poisoning which is problematic in resource poor countries.

Indexed as

AntidotesCardiac GlycosidesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansTachycardiaVentricular FibrillationAntidotesCardiac GlycosidesantibodydigoxinFaboleanderpacingtoxicity

Identifiers

PMID26505271
PMCPMC4767196
OpenAlexW1832986094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.