Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26505061›Full record

ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2015

Proximity and emergency department use: Multilevel analysis using administrative data from patients with cardiovascular risk factors.

Patrick Bergeron, Josiane Courteau, Alain Vanasse

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03641274 (Implementing a Case Management Intervention for Frequent Users of the Emergency Department), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03641274 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Implementing a Case Management Intervention for Frequent Users of the Emergency Department: An Effectiveness-Implementation Hybrid Trial Study Protocol

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Lausanne HospitalsRan2018 to 2020Enrolled120ConditionsFrequent Users of Emergency Department (FUEDs)ArmsCase-management intervention for frequent users of the emergency department
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Patrick Bergeron
Josiane Courteau
Alain Vanasse

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research 204982
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine if geographic proximity to an emergency department (ED) is related to ED use in a metropolitan population of patients with cardiovascular risk factors.

designPopulation-based, retrospective cohort study.

settingThe census metropolitan area of Montreal, Que.

participantsCohort of 99 400 patients with diabetes, hypertension, or dyslipidemia in 2007 without a history of cardiovascular disease. Each patient was spatially referred to 1 of 5857 dissemination areas (DAs).

main outcome measuresAnnual number of visits to an ED with respect to the distance between the centroid of a patient's DA and the closest ED, controlling for age, sex, comorbidities, and neighbourhood immigration, social, and material characteristics. Multilevel logistic and negative binomial regressions were used to determine if the proximity to the closest ED was related to ED use, frequent ED use (≥ 4 visits in a year), and number of ED visits.

resultsA total of 25 889 (26.0%) patients in the cohort visited an ED at least once during a 1-year period, among which 4563 (4.6%) were frequent users with at least 4 visits. These frequent users were responsible for 28 249 (45.5%) of all 62 021 visits to EDs. The distance between a DA and its closest ED was significantly and negatively correlated with ED use (P < .001), even after controlling for confounding variables. Patients living in a DA close to an ED were also more likely to be frequent users, but the extent of use among them (range from 4 to 82 ED visits) was not related to the distance to the closest ED.

conclusionThese results suggest that patients at risk of cardiovascular disease living in a metropolitan area are more likely to seek a medical encounter at the ED if they live closer to it.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityAdministrative Claims, HealthcareAgedDiabetes MellitusDyslipidemiasEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedQuebecRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsUrban Population

Identifiers

PMID26505061
PMCPMC4541449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.