Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26504804›Full record

SynthesisBioMed research international2015

Short-Term Effects of Verapamil and Diltiazem in the Treatment of No Reflow Phenomenon: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Lan Wang, Zhong Cheng, Ye Gu, Dingfeng Peng

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BioMed research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management of Coronary No-Reflow Phenomenon.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2022
    Article
  15. "No-Reflow" Phenomenon: A Contemporary Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management of Coronary No-Reflow Phenomenon.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lan WangHeart Center at Puai Hospital, Wuhan Puai Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
Zhong ChengHeart Center at Puai Hospital, Wuhan Puai Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
Ye GuHeart Center at Puai Hospital, Wuhan Puai Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
Dingfeng PengHeart Center at Puai Hospital, Wuhan Puai Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
Wuhan Puai Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, there is still a lack of an optimal treatment for no reflow phenomenon (NRP). We analyzed the efficacy and safety of using nondihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists (NDHP, verapamil/diltiazem) in patients suffering from NRP. Eight RCTs with 494 participants were eligible for analysis. The pooling analysis showed that intracoronary verapamil/diltiazem injection significantly decreased the occurrence of the coronary NRP (RR: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.16-0.57; P = 0.0002) and reduced corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) frame Count (WMD = -9.24, 95% CI -13.91-4.57; P = 0.0001) in patients with NRP. Moreover, verapamil/diltiazem treatment showed superiority in reducing wall motion index (WMI) compared to the control at day 1 (WMD = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.02-0.20; P = 0.02) (P < 0.05). There was also a significantly greater decline at occurrence of the major adverse cardiac events between verapamil/diltiazem and control groups (WMD: 0.4, 95% CI: 0.19-0.84; P = 0.02). However, using verapamil/diltiazem did not provide additional improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction post procedure (at 7 days, WMD, 0.1; 95% CI, -2.43-2.63; P = 0.94; at 30 days, WMD, 0.42; 95% CI, -2.09-2.92; P = 0.75). NDHP use is beneficial in attenuating NRP and reducing 6-month MACEs in patients with NRP.

Indexed as

Calcium Channel BlockersCardiovascular AgentsDiltiazemHumansNo-Reflow PhenomenonRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVerapamilCalcium Channel BlockersCardiovascular AgentsDiltiazemVerapamil

Identifiers

PMID26504804
PMCPMC4609355
OpenAlexW1954269750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.