Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26504793›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2015

Working Atmosphere and Job Satisfaction of Health Care Staff in Kenya: An Exploratory Study.

Katja Goetz, Michael Marx, Irmgard Marx, Marc Brodowski, Maureen Nafula, Helen Prytherch, Irene K E Omogi Awour, Joachim Szecsenyi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Quality management: where is the evidence? Developing an indicator-based approach in Kenya.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Katja GoetzDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, University of Heidelberg, Vossstrasse 2, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael MarxEvaplan at the University Hospital of Heidelberg, Ringstrasse 19b, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany.
Irmgard MarxEvaplan at the University Hospital of Heidelberg, Ringstrasse 19b, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany.
Marc BrodowskiAQUA-Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care, Maschmühlenweg 8-10, 37073 Goettingen, Germany.
Maureen NafulaInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Research, NHIF Building, 2nd Floor Ragati Road, Upperhill, P.O. Box 307-00202, Nairobi, Kenya.
Helen PrytherchEvaplan at the University Hospital of Heidelberg, Ringstrasse 19b, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany.
Irene K E Omogi AwourGesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), P.O. Box 41607, Nairobi 00100, Kenya.
Joachim SzecsenyiDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, University of Heidelberg, Vossstrasse 2, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany ; AQUA-Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care, Maschmühlenweg 8-10, 37073 Goettingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundJob satisfaction and working atmosphere are important for optimal health care delivery. The study aimed to document working atmosphere and job satisfaction of health care professionals in Kenya and to explore associations between job satisfaction, staff characteristics, and working atmosphere.

methodsData from the integrated quality management system (IQMS) for the health sector in Kenya were used. Job satisfaction was measured with 10 items and with additional 5 items adapted to job situation in Kenya. Working atmosphere was measured with 13 item questionnaire. A stepwise linear regression analysis was performed with overall job satisfaction and working atmosphere, aspects of job satisfaction, and individual characteristics.

resultsOut of 832 questionnaires handed out, 435 questionnaires were completed (response rate: 52.3%). Health care staff indicated high commitment to provide quality services and low levels regarding the adequacy and functionality of equipment at their work station. The aspect "support of the ministry of health" (β = 0.577) showed the highest score of explained variance (32.9%) regarding overall job satisfaction.

conclusionsIQMS which also evaluates job satisfaction and working atmosphere of health care staff provides a good opportunity for strengthening the recruitment and retention of health care staff as well as improving the provision of good quality of care.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelJob SatisfactionOrganizational CultureFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansKenyaMaleWorkloadWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID26504793
PMCPMC4609329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.