Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26504790›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2015

Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Implementation of an Adapted Evidence-Based Mammography Intervention for African American Women.

Linda Highfield, Marieke A Hartman, L Kay Bartholomew, Philomene Balihe, Valerie A Ausborn

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Using Implementation Science to Examine the Impact of Cancer Survivorship Care Plans.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Linda HighfieldDepartment of Management, Policy and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Texas, 1200 Pressler Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Marieke A HartmanDepartment of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Texas, 7000 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
L Kay BartholomewDepartment of Health Promotion and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Texas, 7000 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Philomene BaliheEpiscopal Health Foundation, 500 Fannin Street, Suite 300, Houston, TX 77002, USA.
Valerie A AusbornEpiscopal Health Foundation, 500 Fannin Street, Suite 300, Houston, TX 77002, USA.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE EDUCATION--CANCER PREVENTION/CONTROLR25CA057712 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MULLEN, PATRICIA DOLAN · 1992 to 2017
$8.6M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA057712NCI NIH HHS R25 CA57712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer mortality disparities continue, particularly for uninsured and minority women. A number of effective evidence-based interventions (EBIs) exist for addressing barriers to mammography screening; however, their uptake and use in community has been limited. Few cancer-specific studies have evaluated adapted EBIs in new contexts, and fewer still have considered implementation. This study sought to (1) evaluate the effectiveness of an adapted mammography EBI in improving appointment keeping in African American women and (2) describe processes of implementation in a new practice setting. We used the type 1 hybrid design to test effectiveness and implementation using a quasi-experimental design. Logistic regression and intent-to-treat analysis were used to evaluate mammography appointment attendance. The no-show rate was 44% (comparison) versus 19% (intervention). The adjusted odds of a woman in the intervention group attending her appointment were 3.88 (p < 0.001). The adjusted odds of a woman attending her appointment in the intent-to-treat analysis were 2.31 (p < 0.05). Adapted EBI effectiveness was 3.88 (adjusted OR) versus 2.10 (OR) for the original program, indicating enhanced program effect. A number of implementation barriers and facilitators were identified. Our findings support previous studies noting that sequentially measuring EBI efficacy and effectiveness, followed by implementation, may be missing important contextual information.

Indexed as

AdultBlack or African AmericanBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansMammographyMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePrevalencePrognosisProgram EvaluationReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID26504790
PMCPMC4609333
OpenAlexW2171116632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.