Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26504780›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2015

Prognostic Value of Cancer Stem Cells Markers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Francesca Collina, Maurizio Di Bonito, Valeria Li Bergolis, Michelino De Laurentiis, Carlo Vitagliano, Margherita Cerrone, Francesco Nuzzo, Monica Cantile, Gerardo Botti

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Dihydroconiferyl Ferulate Isolated fromPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francesca CollinaPathology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione "G. Pascale", IRCCS, 80131 Napoli, Italy.
Maurizio Di BonitoPathology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione "G. Pascale", IRCCS, 80131 Napoli, Italy.
Valeria Li BergolisPathology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione "G. Pascale", IRCCS, 80131 Napoli, Italy.
Michelino De LaurentiisDepartment of Breast Surgery and Cancer Prevention, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione "G. Pascale", IRCCS, 80131 Napoli, Italy.
Carlo VitaglianoPathology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione "G. Pascale", IRCCS, 80131 Napoli, Italy.
Margherita CerronePathology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione "G. Pascale", IRCCS, 80131 Napoli, Italy.
Francesco NuzzoDepartment of Breast Surgery and Cancer Prevention, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione "G. Pascale", IRCCS, 80131 Napoli, Italy.
Monica CantilePathology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione "G. Pascale", IRCCS, 80131 Napoli, Italy.
Gerardo BottiPathology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione "G. Pascale", IRCCS, 80131 Napoli, Italy.
Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has a significant clinical relevance of being associated with a shorter median time to relapse and death and does not respond to endocrine therapy or other available targeted agents. Increased aggressiveness of this tumor, as well as resistance to standard drug therapies, may be associated with the presence of stem cell populations within the tumor. Several stemness markers have been described for the various histological subtypes of breast cancer, such as CD44, CD24, CD133, ALDH1, and ABCG2. The role of these markers in breast cancer is not clear yet and above all there are conflicting opinions about their real prognostic value. To investigate the role of CSCs markers in TNBC cancerogenesis and tumor progression, we selected 160 TNBCs samples on which we detected protein expression of CD44, CD24, CD133, ALDH1, and ABCG2 by immunohistochemistry. Our results highlighted a real prognostic role only for CD44 in TNBCs. All other CSCs markers do not appear to be related to the survival of TNBC patients. In conclusion, despite the fact that the presence of the cancer stem cells in the tumor provides important information on its potential aggressiveness, today their detection by immunohistochemistry is not sufficient to confirm their role in carcinogenesis, because specific markers probably are not yet identified.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCytokinesFemaleHumansItalyMiddle AgedNeoplastic Stem CellsPrevalencePrognosisReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentSensitivity and SpecificitySurvival AnalysisBiomarkers, TumorCytokines

Identifiers

PMID26504780
PMCPMC4609334
OpenAlexW2166389600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.