Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26504579›Full record

ArticleHorticulture research2015

Comparative transcriptomics of Central Asian Vitis vinifera accessions reveals distinct defense strategies against powdery mildew.

Katherine C H Amrine, Barbara Blanco-Ulate, Summaira Riaz, Dániel Pap, Laura Jones, Rosa Figueroa-Balderas, M Andrew Walker, Dario Cantu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Horticulture research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The grape powdery mildew resistance lociFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Katherine C H AmrineDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, University of California , Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Barbara Blanco-UlateDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, University of California , Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Summaira RiazDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, University of California , Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Dániel PapDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, University of California , Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA ; Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Corvinus University of Budapest , Villányi út 29-34, 1118 Budapest, Hungary.
Laura JonesDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, University of California , Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Rosa Figueroa-BalderasDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, University of California , Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
M Andrew WalkerDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, University of California , Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Dario CantuDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, University of California , Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
University of California, Davis · USCorvinus University of Budapest · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grape powdery mildew (PM), caused by the biotrophic ascomycete Erysiphe necator, is a devastating fungal disease that affects most Vitis vinifera cultivars. We have previously identified a panel of V. vinifera accessions from Central Asia with partial resistance to PM that possess a Ren1-like local haplotype. In this study, we show that in addition to the typical Ren1-associated late post-penetration resistance, these accessions display a range of different levels of disease development suggesting that alternative alleles or additional genes contribute to determining the outcome of the interaction with the pathogen. To identify potential Ren1-dependent transcriptional responses and functions associated with the different levels of resistance, we sequenced and analyzed the transcriptomes of these Central Asian accessions at two time points of PM infection. Transcriptomes were compared to identify constitutive differences and PM-inducible responses that may underlie their disease resistant phenotype. Responses to E. necator in all resistant accessions were characterized by an early up-regulation of 13 genes, most encoding putative defense functions, and a late down-regulation of 32 genes, enriched in transcriptional regulators and protein kinases. Potential Ren1-dependent responses included a hotspot of co-regulated genes on chromosome 18. We also identified 81 genes whose expression levels and dynamics correlated with the phenotypic differences between the most resistant accessions 'Karadzhandahal', DVIT3351.27, and O34-16 and the other genotypes. This study provides a first exploration of the functions associated with varying levels of partial resistance to PM in V. vinifera accessions that can be exploited as sources of genetic resistance in grape breeding programs.

Identifiers

PMID26504579
PMCPMC4591678
OpenAlexW1879738161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.