Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26504571›Full record

ReviewHorticulture research2015

Current understanding of grapevine defense mechanisms against the biotrophic fungus (Erysiphe necator), the causal agent of powdery mildew disease.

Wenping Qiu, Angela Feechan, Ian Dry

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Horticulture research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 159 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Chromosome-level reference genome ofHorticulture research · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. TheFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A critical review on bioaerosols-dispersal of crop pathogenic microorganisms and their impact on crop yield.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. An effector ofHorticulture research · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. VqMAPK3/VqMAPK6, VqWRKY33, andHorticulture research · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Wenping QiuCenter for Grapevine Biotechnology, W. H. Darr School of Agriculture, Missouri State University , Mountain Grove, MO 65711, USA.
Angela FeechanSchool of Agriculture & Food Science, University College Dublin , Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Ian DryCSIRO Agriculture, Wine Innovation West Building, Waite Campus , Hartley Grove, Urrbrae, SA 5064, Australia.
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUUniversity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most economically important disease of cultivated grapevines worldwide is powdery mildew (PM) caused by the ascomycete fungus Erysiphe necator. The majority of grapevine cultivars used for wine, table grape, and dried fruit production are derived from the Eurasian grape species Vitis vinifera because of its superior aroma and flavor characteristics. However, this species has little genetic resistance against E. necator meaning that grape production is highly dependent on the frequent use of fungicides. The integration of effective genetic resistance into cultivated grapevines would lead to significant financial and environmental benefits and represents a major challenge for viticultural industries and researchers worldwide. This review will outline the strategies being used to increase our understanding of the molecular basis of V. vinifera susceptibility to this fungal pathogen. It will summarize our current knowledge of different resistance loci/genes that have evolved in wild grapevine species to restrict PM infection and assess the potential application of these defense genes in the generation of PM-resistant grapevine germplasm. Finally, it addresses future research priorities which will be important in the rapid identification, evaluation, and deployment of new PM resistance genes which are capable of conferring effective and durable resistance in the vineyard.

Identifiers

PMID26504571
PMCPMC4595975
OpenAlexW1822392863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.