Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26504321›Full record

ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2015

Predictive factors for the outcome of multidisciplinary treatments in chronic low back pain at the first multidisciplinary pain center of Japan.

Kazuhiro Hayashi, Young-Chang P Arai, Tatsunori Ikemoto, Makoto Nishihara, Shigeyuki Suzuki, Tomoe Hirakawa, Shingo Matsuo, Mami Kobayashi, Midori Haruta, Yuka Kawabata and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Effects of High - Intensity Laser in Treatment of Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain.Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences · 2019
    Article
  5. Psychological Treatment Strategy for Chronic Low Back Pain.Spine surgery and related research · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Kazuhiro HayashiMultidisciplinary Pain Center, Aichi Medical University, Japan ; Program in Physical and Occupational Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Japan ; Department of Rehabilitation, Nagoya University Hospital, Japan.
Young-Chang P AraiMultidisciplinary Pain Center, Aichi Medical University, Japan.
Tatsunori IkemotoMultidisciplinary Pain Center, Aichi Medical University, Japan.
Makoto NishiharaMultidisciplinary Pain Center, Aichi Medical University, Japan.
Shigeyuki SuzukiProgram in Physical and Occupational Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Japan.
Tomoe HirakawaProgram in Physical and Occupational Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Japan.
Shingo MatsuoProgram in Physical and Occupational Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Japan.
Mami KobayashiProgram in Physical and Occupational Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Japan.
Midori HarutaProgram in Physical and Occupational Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Japan.
Yuka KawabataProgram in Physical and Occupational Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Japan.
Hiroki TogoProgram in Physical and Occupational Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Japan.
Taiji NoguchiProgram in Physical and Occupational Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Japan.
Toshiyuki HaseProgram in Physical and Occupational Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Japan.
Genki HatanoProgram in Physical and Occupational Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Japan.
Takahiro UshidaMultidisciplinary Pain Center, Aichi Medical University, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

[Purpose] Multidisciplinary treatments are recommended for treatment of chronic low back pain. The aim of this study was to show the associations among multidisciplinary treatment outcomes, pretreatment psychological factors, self-reported pain levels, and history of pain in chronic low back pain patients. [Subjects and Methods] A total of 221 chronic low back pain patients were chosen for the study. The pretreatment scores for the 10-cm Visual Analogue Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, Pain Disability Assessment Scale, pain drawings, and history of pain were collected. The patients were divided into two treatment outcome groups a year later: a good outcome group and a poor outcome group. [Results] One-hundred eighteen patients were allocated to the good outcome group. The scores for the Visual Analogue Scale, Pain Disability Assessment Scale, and affective subscale of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire and number of nonorganic pain drawings in the good outcome group were significantly lower than those in the poor outcome group. Duration of pain in the good outcome group was significantly shorter than in the poor outcome group. [Conclusion] These findings help better predict the efficacy of multidisciplinary treatments in chronic low back pain patients.

Indexed as

Chronic painLow back painMultidisciplinary treatments

Identifiers

PMID26504321
PMCPMC4616122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.