Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26504218›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Science for a wilder Anthropocene: Synthesis and future directions for trophic rewilding research.

Jens-Christian Svenning, Pil B M Pedersen, C Josh Donlan, Rasmus Ejrnæs, Søren Faurby, Mauro Galetti, Dennis M Hansen, Brody Sandel, Christopher J Sandom, John W Terborgh and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 138 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
138citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

138 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Joining forces toward proactive elephant and rhinoceros conservation.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Unintentional rewilding: lessons for trophic rewilding from other forms of species introductions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Shorebird loss increases soil COFundamental research · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Rewilding: history, intervention and the quest for immanence.History and philosophy of the life sciences · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

78 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jens-Christian SvenningSection for Ecoinformatics & Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark; svenning@bios.au.dk.
Pil B M PedersenSection for Ecoinformatics & Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark;
C Josh DonlanAdvanced Conservation Strategies, Midway, UT 84049; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 15853;
Rasmus EjrnæsSection for Biodiversity & Conservation, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, DK-8410 Rønde, Denmark;
Søren FaurbySection for Ecoinformatics & Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark;
Mauro GalettiDepartamento de Ecologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista, 13506-900 Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil;
Dennis M HansenInstitute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland;
Brody SandelSection for Ecoinformatics & Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark;
Christopher J SandomWildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, Oxford University, The Recanati-Kaplan Centre, Oxfordshire OX13 5QL, United Kingdom;
John W TerborghCenter for Tropical Conservation, Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708;
Frans W M VeraCommunity and Conservation Ecology, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Cocon, 9700 CC Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

European Research Council 310886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trophic rewilding is an ecological restoration strategy that uses species introductions to restore top-down trophic interactions and associated trophic cascades to promote self-regulating biodiverse ecosystems. Given the importance of large animals in trophic cascades and their widespread losses and resulting trophic downgrading, it often focuses on restoring functional megafaunas. Trophic rewilding is increasingly being implemented for conservation, but remains controversial. Here, we provide a synthesis of its current scientific basis, highlighting trophic cascades as the key conceptual framework, discussing the main lessons learned from ongoing rewilding projects, systematically reviewing the current literature, and highlighting unintentional rewilding and spontaneous wildlife comebacks as underused sources of information. Together, these lines of evidence show that trophic cascades may be restored via species reintroductions and ecological replacements. It is clear, however, that megafauna effects may be affected by poorly understood trophic complexity effects and interactions with landscape settings, human activities, and other factors. Unfortunately, empirical research on trophic rewilding is still rare, fragmented, and geographically biased, with the literature dominated by essays and opinion pieces. We highlight the need for applied programs to include hypothesis testing and science-based monitoring, and outline priorities for future research, notably assessing the role of trophic complexity, interplay with landscape settings, land use, and climate change, as well as developing the global scope for rewilding and tools to optimize benefits and reduce human-wildlife conflicts. Finally, we recommend developing a decision framework for species selection, building on functional and phylogenetic information and with attention to the potential contribution from synthetic biology.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemAnimalsClimate ChangeHumansResearchScienceSynthetic Biologyconservationmegafaunareintroductionrestorationtrophic cascades

Identifiers

PMID26504218
PMCPMC4743824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.