Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26504211›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Behavioral assessment of sensitivity to intracortical microstimulation of primate somatosensory cortex.

Sungshin Kim, Thierri Callier, Gregg A Tabot, Robert A Gaunt, Francesco V Tenore, Sliman J Bensmaia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Clinical Applications and Future Translation of Somatosensory Neuroprostheses.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Neurosurgery and the Brain-Computer Interface.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Neuronal Spiking Responses to Direct Electrical Microstimulation in the Human Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  14. Restoration of sensory information via bionic hands.Nature biomedical engineering · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sungshin KimDepartment of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637;
Thierri CallierDepartment of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637;
Gregg A TabotCommittee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637;
Robert A GauntDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213;
Francesco V TenoreResearch and Exploratory Development Department, Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Laurel, MD 20723.
Sliman J BensmaiaDepartment of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637; Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637; sliman@uchicago.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) is a powerful tool to investigate the functional role of neural circuits and may provide a means to restore sensation for patients for whom peripheral stimulation is not an option. In a series of psychophysical experiments with nonhuman primates, we investigate how stimulation parameters affect behavioral sensitivity to ICMS. Specifically, we deliver ICMS to primary somatosensory cortex through chronically implanted electrode arrays across a wide range of stimulation regimes. First, we investigate how the detectability of ICMS depends on stimulation parameters, including pulse width, frequency, amplitude, and pulse train duration. Then, we characterize the degree to which ICMS pulse trains that differ in amplitude lead to discriminable percepts across the range of perceptible and safe amplitudes. We also investigate how discriminability of pulse amplitude is modulated by other stimulation parameters-namely, frequency and duration. Perceptual judgments obtained across these various conditions will inform the design of stimulation regimes for neuroscience and neuroengineering applications.

Indexed as

Electric StimulationAnimalsMacaca mulattaSomatosensory Cortexbrain–machine interfacesjust noticeable differenceneuroprostheticspsychophysicsthreshold

Identifiers

PMID26504211
PMCPMC4679002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.