Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26504143›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2016

PDID: database of molecular-level putative protein-drug interactions in the structural human proteome.

Chen Wang, Gang Hu, Kui Wang, Michal Brylinski, Lei Xie, Lukasz Kurgan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. The Human Omnibus of Targetable Pockets.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Databases of ligand-binding pockets and protein-ligand interactions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Databases and Tools to Investigate Protein-Metabolite Interactions.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Computational Methods for Drug Repurposing.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chen WangDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2V4.
Gang HuSchool of Mathematical Sciences and LPMC, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, People's Republic of China.
Kui WangSchool of Mathematical Sciences and LPMC, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, People's Republic of China.
Michal BrylinskiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.
Lei XieDepartment of Computer Science, Hunter College, City University of New York (CUNY), New York, NY 10065, USA and.
Lukasz KurganDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2V4, Department of Computer Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, USA.

Funding

Drug discovery by integrating chemical genomics and structural systems biologyR01LM011986 · NLM · HUNTER COLLEGE · PI BRINKMAN, FIONA, BURLEY, STEPHEN K · 2014 to 2017
$1.2M
NLM NIH HHS LM011986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationMany drugs interact with numerous proteins besides their intended therapeutic targets and a substantial portion of these interactions is yet to be elucidated. Protein-Drug Interaction Database (PDID) addresses incompleteness of these data by providing access to putative protein-drug interactions that cover the entire structural human proteome.

resultsPDID covers 9652 structures from 3746 proteins and houses 16 800 putative interactions generated from close to 1.1 million accurate, all-atom structure-based predictions for several dozens of popular drugs. The predictions were generated with three modern methods: ILbind, SMAP and eFindSite. They are accompanied by propensity scores that quantify likelihood of interactions and coordinates of the putative location of the binding drugs in the corresponding protein structures. PDID complements the current databases that focus on the curated interactions and the BioDrugScreen database that relies on docking to find putative interactions. Moreover, we also include experimentally curated interactions which are linked to their sources: DrugBank, BindingDB and Protein Data Bank. Our database can be used to facilitate studies related to polypharmacology of drugs including repurposing and explaining side effects of drugs. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: PDID database is freely available at http://biomine.ece.ualberta.ca/PDID/.

Indexed as

Databases, PharmaceuticalDatabases, ProteinDrug InteractionsBinding SitesDatabase Management SystemsDrug DesignHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalPharmaceutical PreparationsPolypharmacologyProtein ConformationProteinsProteomePharmaceutical PreparationsProteinsProteome

Identifiers

PMID26504143
PMCPMC5963357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.