Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26503998›Full record

ReviewAnticancer research2015

Natural Products That Target Cancer Stem Cells.

Jim Moselhy, Sowmyalakshmi Srinivasan, Murali K Ankem, Chendil Damodaran

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anticancer research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Advances of medical nanorobots for future cancer treatments.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Targeting cancer stem cell pathways for cancer therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2020
    Review
  18. A natural compound obtained fromOncology letters · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jim MoselhyDepartment of Urology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, U.S.A.
Sowmyalakshmi SrinivasanDepartment of Urology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, U.S.A.
Murali K AnkemDepartment of Urology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, U.S.A.
Chendil DamodaranDepartment of Urology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, U.S.A. chendil.damodaran@louisville.edu.
University of Louisville · US

Funding

Chemoprevention of metastatic colorectal cancerR01CA185972 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI DAMODARAN, CHENDIL · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
Targeting AR and Akt for the Treatment of Prostate CancerR01CA138797 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI DAMODARAN, CHENDIL · 2010 to 2015
$1.5M
Dietary prevention of prostate cancerR01CA140605 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI DAMODARAN, CHENDIL · 2010 to 2015
$1.5M
Novel Herbal Medicine for the Treatment of Prostate CancerR01AT002890 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI DAMODARAN, CHENDIL · 2007 to 2009
$1.1M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT002890NCI NIH HHS R01 CA138797NCI NIH HHS R01CA138797NCI NIH HHS R01 CA140605NCI NIH HHS R01CA140605NCI NIH HHS R01 CA185972
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cancer stem cell model suggests that tumor initiation is governed by a small subset of distinct cells with stem-like character termed cancer stem cells (CSCs). CSCs possess properties of self-renewal and intrinsic survival mechanisms that contribute to resistance of tumors to most chemotherapeutic drugs. The failure to eradicate CSCs during the course of therapy is postulated to be the driving force for tumor recurrence and metastasis. Recent studies have focused on understanding the unique phenotypic properties of CSCs from various tumor types, as well as the signaling pathways that underlie self-renewal and drug resistance. Natural products (NPs) such as those derived from botanicals and food sources may modulate vital signaling pathways involved in the maintenance of CSC phenotype. The Wingless/Integrated (WNT), Hedgehog, Notch and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways have all been associated with quiescence and self-renewal of CSCs, as well as execution of CSC function including differentiation, multidrug resistance and metastasis. Recent studies evaluating NPs against CSC support the epidemiological evidence linking plant-based diets with reduced malignancy rates. This review covers the key aspects of NPs as modulators of CSC fate.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBiological ProductsHumansNeoplasmsNeoplastic Stem CellsPrognosisAntineoplastic AgentsBiological Productscancer stem cellsDietary agentsmechanism of actionreviewsignal transduction pathways

Identifiers

PMID26503998
PMCPMC7523548
OpenAlexW2173621324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.