ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2016
Integrated Bottom-Up and Top-Down Proteomics of Patient-Derived Breast Tumor Xenografts.
Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.
- Top-Down versus Bottom-Up Proteomics in Highly Sensitive LC-MS-Based Profiling of Limited Samples.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Deciphering Proteoform Landscape of Mammary Carcinoma by Top-Down Proteomics.Journal of proteome research · 2025Article
- Mass spectrometry-intensive top-down proteomics: an update on technology advancements and biomedical applications.Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications · 2024Review
- DREAM On, DREAM Off: A Review of the Estrogen Paradox in Luminal A Breast Cancers.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Pilot Evaluation of the Long-Term Reproducibility of Capillary Zone Electrophoresis-Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Top-Down Proteomics of a Complex Proteome Sample.Journal of proteome research · 2024Article
- AI-Assisted Processing Pipeline to Boost Protein Isoform Detection.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Proteomics of Toxigenic Corynebacteria.Proteomes · 2023Review
- Orbitrap Mass Spectrometry and High-Field Asymmetric Waveform Ion Mobility Spectrometry (FAIMS) Enable the in-Depth Analysis of Human Serum Proteoforms.Journal of proteome research · 2023Article
- Identification of Splice Variants and Isoforms in Transcriptomics and Proteomics.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2023Review
- Review
- TopPICR: A Companion R Package for Top-Down Proteomics Data Analysis.Journal of proteome research · 2023Article
- Mouse Stromal Cells Confound Proteomic Characterization and Quantification of Xenograft Models.Cancer research communications · 2023Article
- Deep top-down proteomics revealed significant proteoform-level differences between metastatic and nonmetastatic colorectal cancer cells.Science advances · 2022Article
- Connecting aging biology and inflammation in the omics era.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2022Review
- Mapping the Proteoform Landscape of Five Human Tissues.Journal of proteome research · 2022Article
- Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry for characterizing proteoforms.Mass spectrometry reviews · 2022Review
- The Blood Proteoform Atlas: A reference map of proteoforms in human hematopoietic cells.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2022Article
- The Human Proteoform Atlas: a FAIR community resource for experimentally derived proteoforms.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- Recent Developments and Applications of Quantitative Proteomics Strategies for High-Throughput Biomolecular Analyses in Cancer Research.RSC chemical biology · 2021Article
- New Interface for Faster Proteoform Analysis: Immunoprecipitation Coupled with SampleStream-Mass Spectrometry.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Bottom-up proteomics relies on the use of proteases and is the method of choice for identifying thousands of protein groups in complex samples. Top-down proteomics has been shown to be robust for direct analysis of small proteins and offers a solution to the "peptide-to-protein" inference problem inherent with bottom-up approaches. Here, we describe the first large-scale integration of genomic, bottom-up and top-down proteomic data for the comparative analysis of patient-derived mouse xenograft models of basal and luminal B human breast cancer, WHIM2 and WHIM16, respectively. Using these well-characterized xenograft models established by the National Cancer Institute's Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium, we compared and contrasted the performance of bottom-up and top-down proteomics to detect cancer-specific aberrations at the peptide and proteoform levels and to measure differential expression of proteins and proteoforms. Bottom-up proteomic analysis of the tumor xenografts detected almost 10 times as many coding nucleotide polymorphisms and peptides resulting from novel splice junctions than top-down. For proteins in the range of 0-30 kDa, where quantitation was performed using both approaches, bottom-up proteomics quantified 3,519 protein groups from 49,185 peptides, while top-down proteomics quantified 982 proteoforms mapping to 358 proteins. Examples of both concordant and discordant quantitation were found in a ∼60:40 ratio, providing a unique opportunity for top-down to fill in missing information. The two techniques showed complementary performance, with bottom-up yielding eight times more identifications of 0-30 kDa proteins in xenograft proteomes, but failing to detect differences in certain posttranslational modifications (PTMs), such as phosphorylation pattern changes of alpha-endosulfine. This work illustrates the potency of a combined bottom-up and top-down proteomics approach to deepen our knowledge of cancer biology, especially when genomic data are available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.