Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26503683›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2015

Leadership solves collective action problems in small-scale societies.

Luke Glowacki, Chris von Rueden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The social leverage effect: Institutions transform weak reputation effects into strong incentives for cooperation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Cultural tightness and resilience against environmental shocks in nonindustrial societies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Group Coordination Catalyzes Individual and Cultural Intelligence.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2024
    Article
  10. Identifying key socioecological factors influencing the expression of egalitarianism and inequality among foragers.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Towards Description of Universals of Culture as an Aggression Control System.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2023
    Article
  12. Catalyzing success in community-based conservation.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2023
    Review
  13. New perspectives on the evolution of women's cooperation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  14. Key individuals catalyse intergroup violence.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  15. Intergroup conflict: origins, dynamics and consequences across taxa.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  16. The ecology of wealth inequality in animal societies.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Large-sample-size assessment of socioeconomic predictors of community-level resource management occurrence.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2022
    Article
  18. Dominance in humans.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Social hierarchies and social networks in humans.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Luke GlowackiDepartment of Human Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA Program for Evolutionary Dynamics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA lukeglowacki@gmail.com.
Chris von RuedenJepson School of Leadership Studies, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA 23173, USA cvonrued@richmond.edu.

Funding

The Human Life Course and the Biodemography of AgingR01AG024119 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI GURVEN, MICHAEL DOUGLAS, KAPLAN, HILLARD S · 2004 to 2015
$7.4M
NIA NIH HHS R01AG024 119-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Observation of leadership in small-scale societies offers unique insights into the evolution of human collective action and the origins of sociopolitical complexity. Using behavioural data from the Tsimane forager-horticulturalists of Bolivia and Nyangatom nomadic pastoralists of Ethiopia, we evaluate the traits of leaders and the contexts in which leadership becomes more institutional. We find that leaders tend to have more capital, in the form of age-related knowledge, body size or social connections. These attributes can reduce the costs leaders incur and increase the efficacy of leadership. Leadership becomes more institutional in domains of collective action, such as resolution of intragroup conflict, where collective action failure threatens group integrity. Together these data support the hypothesis that leadership is an important means by which collective action problems are overcome in small-scale societies.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorCultural CharacteristicsLeadershipBoliviaDecision MakingEthiopiaFemaleFood SupplyGroup ProcessesHierarchy, SocialHumansInterpersonal RelationsMalecollective actioncooperationforagersleadershippastoralists

Identifiers

PMID26503683
PMCPMC4633846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.