Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26503674›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Endocrinology2016

The best of both worlds - managing the cancer, saving the bone.

Issam Makhoul, Corey O Montgomery, Dana Gaddy, Larry J Suva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Endocrinology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diagnostic performance ofOncology letters · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Innovative Biomaterials for the Treatment of Bone Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Advanced Black Phosphorus Nanomaterials for Bone Regeneration.International journal of nanomedicine · 2020
    Review
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. PMMA-FeTheranostics · 2019
    Article
  16. Hallmarks of Bone Metastasis.Calcified tissue international · 2018
    Review
  17. PTHrP(12-48) Modulates the Bone Marrow Microenvironment and Suppresses Human Osteoclast Differentiation and Lifespan.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2017
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Issam MakhoulDepartment of Medicine, Division of Haematology/Oncology, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.
Corey O MontgomeryDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Centre for Orthopaedic Research, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.
Dana GaddyDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.
Larry J SuvaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Centre for Orthopaedic Research, Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · US

Funding

Breast Cancer Bone MetastasisR01CA166060 · NCI · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI SUVA, LARRY J. · 2013 to 2017
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA166060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of breast cancer, the importance of the skeleton in the regulation of primary tumour development and as a site for subsequent metastasis is well characterized. Our understanding of the contributions made by the host bone and bone marrow cells increasingly demonstrates the extent of the interaction between tumour cells and normal host cells. As a result, the need to develop and utilize therapies that can impede the growth and/or function of tumour cells while sparing normal host bone and bone marrow cells is immense and expanding. The need for these new treatments is, however, superimposed on the orthopaedic management of patients' quality of life, where pain control and continued locomotion are paramount. Indeed, the majority of the anticancer therapies used to date often result in direct or indirect damage to bone. Thus, although the bone microenvironment regulates tumour cell growth in bone, cells within the bone marrow niche also mediate many of the orthopaedic consequences of tumour progression as well as resistance to the antitumour effects of existing therapies. In this Review, we highlight the effects of existing cancer treatments on bone and the bone marrow microenvironment as well as the mechanisms mediating these effects and the current utility of modern orthopaedic interventions.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementBone MarrowBone NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansQuality of LifeTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID26503674
PMCPMC5518797
OpenAlexW1847485611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.