Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26503597›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Three-Dimensional Blood-Brain Barrier Model for in vitro Studies of Neurovascular Pathology.

Hansang Cho, Ji Hae Seo, Keith H K Wong, Yasukazu Terasaki, Joseph Park, Kiwan Bong, Ken Arai, Eng H Lo, Daniel Irimia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. HumanBioactive materials · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Blood-Brain Barrier Breakdown in Neuroinflammation: Current In Vitro Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. In Vitro 3D Modeling of Neurodegenerative Diseases.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hansang ChoBioMEMS Resource Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02129, United States.
Ji Hae SeoNeuroprotection Research Laboratory Center, Mass General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, 02129, United States.
Keith H K WongBioMEMS Resource Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02129, United States.
Yasukazu TerasakiNeuroprotection Research Laboratory Center, Mass General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, 02129, United States.
Joseph ParkMechanical Engineering and Engineering Science, Center for Biomedical Engineering and Science, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 28223, United States.
Kiwan BongBioMEMS Resource Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02129, United States.
Ken AraiNeuroprotection Research Laboratory Center, Mass General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, 02129, United States.
Eng H LoNeuroprotection Research Laboratory Center, Mass General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, 02129, United States.
Daniel IrimiaBioMEMS Resource Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02129, United States.

Funding

Bio-MicroElectroMechanical Systems Resource CenterP41EB002503 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI TONER, MEHMET · 2004 to 2018
$17.4M
Interdepartmental Neuroscience CenterP30NS045776 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BREAKEFIELD, XANDRA OWENS, TANNOUS, BAKHOS A · 2003 to 2018
$11.1M
Neutrophil Decision Making in Confined Environments in Health and DiseaseR01GM092804 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI IRIMIA, DANIEL · 2010 to 2022
$4.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS EB002503NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB002503NIGMS NIH HHS GM092804NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM092804NINDS NIH HHS NS045776NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS045776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood-brain barrier (BBB) pathology leads to neurovascular disorders and is an important target for therapies. However, the study of BBB pathology is difficult in the absence of models that are simple and relevant. In vivo animal models are highly relevant, however they are hampered by complex, multi-cellular interactions that are difficult to decouple. In vitro models of BBB are simpler, however they have limited functionality and relevance to disease processes. To address these limitations, we developed a 3-dimensional (3D) model of BBB on a microfluidic platform. We verified the tightness of the BBB by showing its ability to reduce the leakage of dyes and to block the transmigration of immune cells towards chemoattractants. Moreover, we verified the localization at endothelial cell boundaries of ZO-1 and VE-Cadherin, two components of tight and adherens junctions. To validate the functionality of the BBB model, we probed its disruption by neuro-inflammation mediators and ischemic conditions and measured the protective function of antioxidant and ROCK-inhibitor treatments. Overall, our 3D BBB model provides a robust platform, adequate for detailed functional studies of BBB and for the screening of BBB-targeting drugs in neurological diseases.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierCerebrovascular CirculationAnimalsBrainCell LineHumansIn Vitro TechniquesRats

Identifiers

PMID26503597
PMCPMC4622078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.