Trial reportNeurocritical care2016
Intracranial Pressure During Pressure Control and Pressure-Regulated Volume Control Ventilation in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Crossover trial.
Trial report in Neurocritical care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01955785 (Respiratory Treatment of Patients With Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Respiratory Treatment of Patients With Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomised Comparison of Pressure Controlled Ventilation and Pressure Regulated Volume Controlled Ventilation
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neurological and respiratory effects of lung protective ventilation in acute brain injury patients without lung injury: brain vent, a single centre randomized interventional study.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Trial
- Mechanical ventilation in acute brain injury.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2026Review
- Balancing lung and brain: physiological strategies for ARDS management in acute brain injury.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- Brain Protective Ventilation Strategies in Severe Acute Brain Injury.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025Review
- Review of Ventilation in Traumatic Brain Injury.Respiratory care · 2025Review
- PaCONeurocritical care · 2024Article
- PaCO2 Association with Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Outcomes at High Altitude: A Prospective Single-Center Cohort Study.Research square · 2024Article
- Comparison of respiratory and hemodynamic stability in patients with traumatic brain injury ventilated by two ventilator modes: Pressure regulated volume control versus synchronized intermittent mechanical ventilation.Advanced biomedical research · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMechanical ventilation with control of partial arterial CO2 pressures (PaCO2) is used to treat or stabilize intracranial pressure (ICP) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Pressure-regulated volume control (PRVC) is a ventilator mode where inspiratory pressures are automatically adjusted to deliver the patient a pre-set stable tidal volume (TV). This may result in a more stable PaCO2 and thus a more stable ICP compared with conventional pressure control (PC) ventilation. The aim of this study was to compare PC and PRVC ventilation in TBI patients with respect to ICP and PaCO2.
methodsThis is a randomized crossover trial including eleven patients with a moderate or severe TBI who were mechanically ventilated and had ICP monitoring. Each patient was administered alternating 2-h periods of PC and PRVC ventilation. The outcome variables were ICP and PaCO2.
resultsFifty-two (26 PC, 26 PRVC) study periods were included. Mean ICP was 10.8 mmHg with PC and 10.3 mmHg with PRVC ventilation (p = 0.38). Mean PaCO2 was 36.5 mmHg (4.87 kPa) with PC and 36.1 mmHg (4.81 kPa) with PRVC (p = 0.38). There were less fluctuations in ICP (p = 0.02) and PaCO2 (p = 0.05) with PRVC ventilation.
conclusionsMean ICP and PaCO2 were similar for PC and PRVC ventilation in TBI patients, but PRVC ventilation resulted in less fluctuation in both ICP and PaCO2. We cannot exclude that the two ventilatory modes would have impact on ICP in patients with higher ICP values; however, the similar PaCO2 observations argue against this.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.