Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26503365›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Stochastic Optical Reconstruction Microscopy Imaging of Microtubule Arrays in Intact Arabidopsis thaliana Seedling Roots.

Bin Dong, Xiaochen Yang, Shaobin Zhu, Diane C Bassham, Ning Fang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cargo navigation across 3D microtubule intersections.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bin DongAmes Laboratory, US Department of Energy and Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011.
Xiaochen YangDepartment of Genetics, Development and Cell Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011.
Shaobin ZhuAmes Laboratory, US Department of Energy and Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011.
Diane C BasshamDepartment of Genetics, Development and Cell Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011.
Ning FangDepartment of Chemistry, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 3965, Atlanta, Georgia 30302.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Super-resolution fluorescence microscopy has generated tremendous success in revealing detailed subcellular structures in animal cells. However, its application to plant cell biology remains extremely limited due to numerous technical challenges, including the generally high fluorescence background of plant cells and the presence of the cell wall. In the current study, stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM) imaging of intact Arabidopsis thaliana seedling roots with a spatial resolution of 20-40 nm was demonstrated. Using the super-resolution images, the spatial organization of cortical microtubules in different parts of a whole Arabidopsis root tip was analyzed quantitatively, and the results show the dramatic differences in the density and spatial organization of cortical microtubules in cells of different differentiation stages or types. The method developed can be applied to plant cell biological processes, including imaging of additional elements of the cytoskeleton, organelle substructure, and membrane domains.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsMeristemMicroscopy, FluorescenceMicrotubulesPlant RootsSeedlingsArabidopsis Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26503365
PMCPMC4621606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.