Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26503139›Full record

Trial reportTrials2015

Fostering emotional, social, physical and educational wellbeing in rural India: the methods of a multi-arm randomized controlled trial of Girls First.

Katherine Sachs Leventhal, Lisa M DeMaria, Jane Gillham, Gracy Andrew, John W Peabody, Steve Leventhal

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02429661 (Girls First - India Evaluation), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02429661 nacompletednot on this map

Girls First - India Evaluation (2013-2015)

TypeinterventionalSponsorCorStoneRan2013 to 2015Enrolled4,592ConditionsEmotional Wellbeing, Social Wellbeing, Physical WellbeingArmsPeer support groups
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Intervention Tournaments: An Overview of Concept, Design, and Implementation.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine Sachs LeventhalCorStone, 250 Camino Alto, Suite 100A, Mill Valley, CA, USA. kates@corstone.org.
Lisa M DeMariaQURE Healthcare, 1000 Fourth St., Suite 300, San Rafael, CA, USA. ldemaria@qurehealthcare.com.
Jane GillhamDepartment of Psychology, Swarthmore College, 500 College Avenue, Swarthmore, PA, USA. jgillha1@swarthmore.edu.
Gracy AndrewCorStone India Foundation, c/o Ajay K. Sud & Associates, B-4 Greater Kailash Enclave, Part-II, New Delhi, 110048, India. gracya@corstone.org.
John W PeabodyQURE Healthcare, QURE Healthcare, 1000 Fourth St., Suite 300, San Rafael, CA, USA. jpeabody@qurehealthcare.com.
Steve LeventhalCorStone, 250 Camino Alto, Suite 100A, Mill Valley, CA, USA. stevel@corstone.org.
Mill Valley Public Library · USSwarthmore College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are 600 million girls in low and middle income countries (LMICs), many of whom are at great risk for poor health and education. There is thus great need for programs that can effectively improve wellbeing for these girls. Although many interventions have been developed to address these issues, most focus on health and education without integrating attention to social and emotional factors. This omission is unfortunate, as nascent evidence indicates that these factors are closely related to health and education. This paper describes the methods of a 4-arm randomized controlled trial among 3,560 adolescent girls in rural Bihar, India that tested whether adding an intervention targeting social-emotional issues (based on a "resilience framework") to an adolescent health intervention would improve emotional, social, physical, and educational wellbeing to a greater extent than its components and a control group. Study arms were: (1) Girls First, a combination of the Girls First Resilience Curriculum (RC) and the Girls First Health Curriculum (HC); (2) Girls First Resilience Curriculum (RC) alone; (3) Girls First Health Curriculum (HC) alone; and (4) a school-as-usual control group (SC).

methodsSeventy-six schools were randomized (19 per condition) and 74 local women with a tenth grade education were trained and monitored to facilitate the program. Quantitative data were collected from 3,560 girls over 4 assessment points with very low rates of participant attrition. Qualitative assessments were conducted with a subset of 99 girls and 27 facilitators. RESULTS AND

conclusionsIn this article, we discuss guiding principles that facilitated trial implementation, including integrating diverse local and non-local sources of knowledge, focusing on flexibility of planning and implementation, prioritizing systematic measurement selection, and striking a balance between scientific rigor and real-world feasibility.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT02429661 . Registered 24 April 2015.

Indexed as

Adolescent Health ServicesEducational StatusEmotionsHealth StatusPeer GroupPhysical FitnessQuality of LifeSchool Health ServicesSocial BehaviorAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorAge FactorsCurriculumEducational MeasurementFemaleHumans

Identifiers

PMID26503139
PMCPMC4620631
OpenAlexW1886154486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.