Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26502986›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

Opening the "black box" of nodD3, nodD4 and nodD5 genes of Rhizobium tropici strain CIAT 899.

Pablo del Cerro, Amanda Alves Paiva Rolla-Santos, Douglas Fabiano Gomes, Bettina Berquó Marks, María del Rosario Espuny, Miguel Ángel Rodríguez-Carvajal, María Eugenia Soria-Díaz, André Shigueyoshi Nakatani, Mariangela Hungria, Francisco Javier Ollero and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. TheMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. OnfD, an AraC-Type Transcriptional Regulator Encoded byApplied and environmental microbiology · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Genome Sequence ofGenome announcements · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pablo del CerroDepartamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, Avda. Reina Mercedes, 6 Apdo Postal 41012, Sevilla, Spain. pdelcerro@us.es.
Amanda Alves Paiva Rolla-SantosEmbrapa Soja, C.P. 231, 86001-970, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil. amandaaapr@gmail.com.
Douglas Fabiano GomesEmbrapa Soja, C.P. 231, 86001-970, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil. douglasfgomes@yahoo.com.br.
Bettina Berquó MarksEmbrapa Soja, C.P. 231, 86001-970, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil. bettinamarks@gmail.com.
María del Rosario EspunyDepartamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, Avda. Reina Mercedes, 6 Apdo Postal 41012, Sevilla, Spain. espuny@us.es.
Miguel Ángel Rodríguez-CarvajalDepartamento de Química Orgánica, Facultad de Química, Universidad de Sevilla, Apdo Postal 553, 41071, Sevilla, Spain. rcarvaj@us.es.
María Eugenia Soria-DíazCentro de Investigación Tecnología e Innovación de la Universidad de Sevilla (CITIUS), Avda. Reinas Mercedes, 4B, 41012, Sevilla, Spain. eugenia@us.es.
André Shigueyoshi NakataniEmbrapa Soja, C.P. 231, 86001-970, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil. andrenakatani@yahoo.com.br.
Mariangela HungriaEmbrapa Soja, C.P. 231, 86001-970, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil. mariangela.hungria@embrapa.br.
Francisco Javier OlleroDepartamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, Avda. Reina Mercedes, 6 Apdo Postal 41012, Sevilla, Spain. fjom@us.es.
Manuel MegíasDepartamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, Avda. Reina Mercedes, 6 Apdo Postal 41012, Sevilla, Spain. megiasg@us.es.
Universidad de Sevilla · ESBrazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranscription of nodulation genes in rhizobial species is orchestrated by the regulatory nodD gene. Rhizobium tropici strain CIAT 899 is an intriguing species in possessing features such as broad host range, high tolerance of abiotic stresses and, especially, by carrying the highest known number of nodD genes--five--and the greatest diversity of Nod factors (lipochitooligosaccharides, LCOs). Here we shed light on the roles of the multiple nodD genes of CIAT 899 by reporting, for the first time, results obtained with nodD3, nodD4 and nodD5 mutants.

methodsThe three nodD mutants were built by insertion of Ω interposon. Nod factors were purified and identified by LC-MS/MS analyses. In addition, nodD1 and nodC relative gene expressions were measured by quantitative RT-PCR in the wt and derivative mutant strains. Phenotypic traits such as exopolysaccharide (EPS), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), swimming and swarming motilities, biofilm formation and indole acetid acid (IAA) production were also perfomed. All these experiments were carried out in presence of both inducers of CIAT 899, apigenin and salt. Finally, nodulation assays were evaluated in up to six different legumes, including common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.).

resultsPhenotypic and symbiotic properties, Nod factors and gene expression of nodD3, nodD4 and nodD5 mutants were compared with those of the wild-type (WT) CIAT 899, both in the presence and in the absence of the nod-gene-inducing molecule apigenin and of saline stress. No differences between the mutants and the WT were observed in exopolysaccharide (EPS) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) profiles, motility, indole acetic acid (IAA) synthesis or biofilm production, either in the presence, or in the absence of inducers. Nodulation studies demonstrated the most complex regulatory system described so far, requiring from one (Leucaena leucocephala, Lotus burtii) to four (Lotus japonicus) nodD genes. Up to 38 different structures of Nod factors were detected, being higher under salt stress, except for the nodD5 mutant; in addition, a high number of structures was synthesized by the nodD4 mutant in the absence of any inducer. Probable activator (nodD3 and nodD5) or repressor roles (nodD4), possibly via nodD1 and/or nodD2, were attributed to the three nodD genes. Expression of nodC, nodD1 and each nodD studied by RT-qPCR confirmed that nodD3 is an activator of nodD1, both in the presence of apigenin and salt stress. In contrast, nodD4 might be an inducer with apigenin and a repressor under saline stress, whereas nodD5 was an inducer under both conditions.

conclusionsWe report for R. tropici CIAT 899 the most complex model of regulation of nodulation genes described so far. Five nodD genes performed different roles depending on the host plant and the inducing environment. Nodulation required from one to four nodD genes, depending on the host legume. nodD3 and nodD5 were identified as activators of the nodD1 gene, whereas, for the first time, it was shown that a regulatory nodD gene-nodD4-might act as repressor or inducer, depending on the inducing environment, giving support to the hypothesis that nodD roles go beyond nodulation, in terms of responses to abiotic stresses.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialBacterial ProteinsRhizobium tropiciBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26502986
PMCPMC4624370
OpenAlexW1882128902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.