ArticleJournal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea)2015
Niabella ginsenosidivorans sp. nov., isolated from compost.
Article in Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-based classification of Paraniabella aurantiaca gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from soil and taxonomic reclassification of five species within the genus Niabella.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Article
- Niabella digestorum sp. nov., a High Cell-Surface Hydrophobic Bacterium Isolated from Waste Digestion System.Current microbiology · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A Gram-reaction negative, strictly aerobic, non-motile, orange colored, and rod-shaped bacterium (designated BS26(T)) isolated from compost, was characterized by a polyphasic approach to clarify its taxonomic position. Strain BS26(T) was observed to grow optimally at 25-30 °C and at pH 7.0 on R2A and nutrient media. Strain BS26(T) showed ß-glucosidase activity that was responsible for its ability to transform ginsenoside Rb1 (one of the active components of ginseng) to ginsenoside compound-K (C-K). Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences indicated that strain BS26(T) belongs to the genus Niabella of family Chitinophagaceae and was most closely related to Niabella soli DSM 19437(T) (94.5% similarity), N. yanshanensis CCBAU 05354(T) (94.3%), and N. aurantiaca DSM 17617(T) (93.8%). The G+C content of genomic DNA was 47.3 mol%. Chemotaxonomic data [predominant isoprenoid quinone-MK-7, major fatty acids-iso-C15:0, iso-C15:1 G, iso-C17:0 3-OH, and summed feature 3 (comprising C16:1 ω7c and/or C16:1 ω6c)] supported the affiliation of strain BS26(T) to the genus Niabella. However, strain BS26(T) could be differentiated genotypically and phenotypically from the recognized species of the genus Niabella. The novel isolate therefore represents a novel species, for which the name Niabella ginsenosidivorans sp. nov. is proposed, with the type strain BS26(T) (=KACC 16620(T) =JCM 18199(T)).
Indexed as
Identifiers
26502960What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.